Los Angeles Cops Bring the Echo Park Tent Community to a Violent End

They cleared an encampment and took “part of the soul of LA” with it.

Dozens of police officers line up in front of Echo Park. Sarah Zimmerman

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Thursday evening, around 200 hundred people arrived at the corner of Sunset and Lemoyne in Los Angelesā€™ Echo Park. Under a cool, cloudy sky, they raised signs that read ā€œServices Not Sweepsā€ and ā€œHousing is a human right.ā€ For years the neighborhood has been at the center of citywide conversations around gentrification and housing insecurity. This week, all that discourse came vividly to life.

The protesters were there for a vigil in support of the more than 100 unhoused people whoā€”until that nightā€”had called Echo Park their home. That evening advocates for the unhoused directed their anger not only at the LAPD but at city council member Mitch Oā€™Farrell, who oversees District 13 and who tried to clear the park last year only to be thwarted in his efforts. On Wednesday, the Los Angeles Times had broken news of O’Farrell’s quiet plans to close the park for minor renovations like painting the bathrooms. To activists and park residents, this was coded language that could mean only one thing: sweeping the tent community that, since taking root in the park in November 2019, had become a sort of city unto itself.

As the sky darkened, protesters formed a line in front of cops in riot gear who were blocking the entrance to the park; earlier that morning, the city had erected a metal fence around the park and begun relocating park residents. I saw two officers step onto the lawn of Angelus Temple church with cameras. Protesters booed as the police filmed them; some flashed strobe lights at the police in dissent. Around 8 p.m., police declared an “unlawful assembly”ā€”at least I think they did. Barely anything was audible over the beat of the protesters’ drums.

Cops then began to push protesters away from the park, and it was clear to me that they were trying to kettle us in. Within minutes a second fleet of police ran out from a neighboring alleyway and surrounded protesters. I managed to escape, fearing perhaps selfishly what might happen to me, a young Black trans reporter with a flimsy makeshift press pass. From the stoop of a house down the street, I saw officers pointing green beanbag shotguns at people and shouting at them for refusing to disperse in time.

Later, the final tally would show that LAPD had arrested over 180 peopleā€”including four of my friendsā€”and at least 13 journalists from the Los Angeles Times, LA Taco, Knock LA, and others. A few National Lawyers Guild observers were also detained. Los Angeles authorities have grown increasingly hostile toward journalists in the past year. In September, while covering a protest crackdown, KPCC reporter Josie Huang was slammed to ground by county sheriffā€™s deputies despite repeatedly announcing she was a member of the media. 

This latest confrontation had been brewing for days. Earlier this week police and park rangers announced that everyone who lived in the park would have to vacate by 10:30 Thursday night. At a press conference Thursday morning, Oā€™Farrell touted his officeā€™s success in securing housing for 166 park residents through the cityā€™s COVID housing initiative, Project Room Key.

But many residents and activists have accused Oā€™Farrell of falling short on his promises. Responding to the council member’s statement that all of the park residents had received housing, one former resident named Gustavo told tenants’ rights organization Street Watch LA, “They’re lying.” He said: ā€œThey convinced me that they have rooms available but once you come out, they donā€™t. They have hotels all the way in Downey”ā€”a city about 15 miles south of Echo Parkā€””but not around here. They said I have to wait. Iā€™m on the waiting list. Right now Iā€™m going to sleep on the streets. I have nowhere to go.ā€

Albert Corado, an organizer with the NOlympics LA and the Peopleā€™s City Council, believes O’Farrell neither understands nor cares about the needs of the unhoused community and instead is trying to curry favor with ā€œrich white homeowners.ā€ Corado also cited Oā€™Farrellā€™s campaign contributionsā€”thousands of dollars of which come from police officers and real estate developers, according to data from the Los Angeles Ethics Commissionā€”as evidence that the council memberā€™s values are in direct opposition to the needs of the most vulnerable people in his district.

ā€œPeople are being housed for a few nights, maybe a week or two. Theyā€™re going to be displaced and told to leave as they always are. If they go to shelters, itā€™s the same deal. And now they donā€™t have their home,ā€ Corado said. ā€œWhatever solution has been given to people, itā€™s temporary. Itā€™s not supposed to get you off the street or get you a job or a downpayment on an apartment. Itā€™s just meant to get you out of sight and out of mindā€”out of the park.ā€

Corado plans to run against O’Farrell in 2022, by which point the council member will have been in office nine years. In 2018, his sister Mely Corado was shot and killed by police while at her job at the Silver Lake Trader Joeā€™s. Corado figured the best way to remember his sister and ā€œfinish her workā€ was to organize a campaign devoted to defunding the police.

ā€œThe way that the police responded, the way that they reasoned why they shot into a crowded grocery store, woke me up to how all of these things are connected,ā€ Corado said.

Lil Kalish

For nearly a year, the Echo Park tent community had transformed one of the cityā€™s most iconic parks into an autonomous commune. Park residents built a community garden, and erected showers, medical tents, and a functioning kitchen. Failed again and again by a city that would not house them, they created a space for healing amid the trauma of homelessness, drug addiction, and mental illness. Even as the community faced eviction, residents found love and support within the park. The Los Angeles Times reported that one unhoused couple married a few days before sweeps were scheduled to happen.

ā€œThe biggest pandemic in years actually turned out to be a blessing for us,” Echo Park residents wrote in a statement.Without the constant LAPD and city harassment uprooting our lives we’ve been able to grow. To come together as a community, not just unhoused but housed as well and work together for the mutual aid and benefit of each other.ā€ 

Now, with a fence wrapped around its perimeter and the two remaining residents arrested as of Friday morning, the future of the park remains uncertain. Mayor Eric Garcetti applauded the conclusion of the operation to close Echo Park, telling reporters this has been the “largest housing transition of an encampment ever in the cityā€™s history.ā€

But as the pandemic continues to displace people throughout Los Angelesā€” and the entire countryā€”activists worry about what these forced evictions mean for the longterm care of unhoused communities. They worry for their own safety as well. (One protester reported that his arm was broken by an officer with a baton during Wednesday’s clash with the police.)

ā€œWhatever the city didnā€™t give them, they found for themselves,ā€ Corado said. ā€œIt was a righteous community of people who cared about each other. And if we lose that, we lose not only some character here in Los Angeles, but we are losing a part of the soul of Los Angeles.ā€

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate