Peter Thiel’s Huge Donation Backing J.D. Vance Could Upend the Ohio Senate Race

His $10 million super-PAC contribution is unprecedented.

Peter Thiel speaks during the final day of the 2016 Republican National Convention in Cleveland. J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Silicon Valley venture capitalist Peter Thiel dropped an enormous bomb on the 2022 Ohio Senate race last month, donating $10 million to a super-PAC established to back J.D. Vance, the author of Hillbilly Elegy, who is considering a run for the seat that will be vacated by current Republican Sen. Rob Portman. Since the Citizens United decision in 2012, the flow of million-dollar or even multimillion-dollar checks has become relatively commonplace. But Thiel’s $10 million donation appears to be the largest contribution ever made to a super-PAC backing a single candidate for the Senate. 

According to OpenSecrets.org, while there have been donations of $10 million or more to super-PACs that support presidential candidates or multiple candidates, there is only one other time that a single donor has given $10 million to a super-PAC that backs a single Senate candidate—and that was over the course of the campaign: In 2018, Citadel LLC, the hedge fund run by Kenneth Griffin, made several contributions totaling $10 million to support a super-PAC backing Rick Scott’s successful Senate bid. 

And the timing of Thiel’s donation has enormous implications, potentially helping to rocket Vance to the head of the pack in what could be a crowded Republican primary. While the average amount spent by winning Senate candidates has crept up over the years, even by recent standards (in 2018, the average winning candidate spent $15.7 million), $10 million is an enormous amount for a candidate to have stashed and ready to be spent for him—when he hasn’t even declared his candidacy.

A number of potentially strong candidates have already announced their intentions to run for Portman’s seat, including former Ohio Treasurer Josh Mandel, who previously challenged Sen. Sherrod Brown, and Jane Timken, who is said to be an early favorite for an endorsement from former President Donald Trump. But there’s also a string of other hopefuls who may be deterred by such a show of force from a Vance supporter. 

Thiel, politically known for his libertarianism, has a history of being willing to spend freely on political candidates and then shut the checkbook when he’s not interested. He wrote large seven-figure checks to support candidates in the past (a super-PAC supporting Portman received $1 million from a Thiel-owned firm in 2016). After initially backing Carly Fiorina in 2016, he switched his support to Donald Trump, stroking a $1.25 million check for a pro-Trump super-PAC. But after the 2018 cycle, he backed away from Trump, reportedly disenchanted with the president, cutting back his donations broadly and supporting Republicans further down the ticket, such as the $1 million he dropped in support of former Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach in his failed Senate bid.

Thiel’s $10 million donation went to a super-PAC formed last month called Protect Ohio Values, which on its website describes itself as “a network of grassroots conservatives committed to electing a Senator who will stand for and defend Ohio’s values in Washington, DC,” and tags Vance as the one to do that. According to the Cincinnati Enquirer, which first reported Thiel’s donation, the super-PAC also received a “significant contribution” from the conservative hedge fund billionaire Robert Mercer, who also backed Trump in 2016, but was far less involved in 2020. (Mercer also supported the same super-PAC backing Portman in 2016 that Thiel did). 

Thiel and Mercer may stretch the definition of “grassroots conservatives,” but Thiel and Vance do have some personal history. Vance worked for one of Thiel’s venture capital funds after he graduated from law school, and Thiel later backed Vance’s own venture fund.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate