“You’re Doing Nothing”: Judge Slams ICE for Failing to Vaccinate Detainees

The lawsuit covers people at a detention center in upstate New York.

People detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement exercise at the Adelanto detention center in California in 2019.Chris Carlson/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Thursday morning, federal judge Lawrence Vilardo criticized Immigration and Customs Enforcement for failing to provide medically vulnerable people it is detaining in upstate New York access to COVID-19 vaccinations. “You’re doing nothing to get them the vaccine,” Vilardo told the government attorney representing ICE. “Nothing. Zero.”

In late February, Vilardo ordered ICE to come up with a plan for vaccinating people detained at its immigration detention center in Batavia, a town about 40 miles east of Buffalo. ICE responded on Wednesday with a plan that wasn’t much of a plan at all. Essentially, the government said in a court filing that it’s waiting for New York health officials to provide vaccines that it can administer at the detention center. On Thursday, Vilardo said that the response violated the constitutional rights of people being held in Batavia.

John Peng, the Prisoners’ Legal Services of New York attorney who argued the case on Thursday, says at least 50 of the roughly 260 people detained at Batavia are eligible to be vaccinated. None are over 65, but they qualify as part of New York’s Phase 1b, which covers people with medical conditions like diabetes.

Nationally, ICE’s plans for vaccinating the roughly 14,000 people in its custody have caused confusion. ICE has often implied that it’s up to states to provide vaccines for immigrant detainees. States, meanwhile, have often assumed ICE is handling the vaccinations. Compared to ICE, the Bureau of Prisons has worked closely with the federal government’s vaccination team to obtain doses. More than 52,000 inmates in its custody had been vaccinated by February 22. 

ICE spokesperson Alvin Phillips did not respond to a question about how many people in the agency’s custody have been vaccinated. He said ICE’s Health Service Corp has a plan for vaccinating people at Batavia “once ICE receives the vaccines from New York state public health officials.” Phillips could not comment further due to the pending litigation.

Since the start of the pandemic, more than 9,600 people in ICE detention centers have tested positive for COVID-19. Nine of those people have died. As of Wednesday, there were 340 active infections among people in detention. Fifty-one of those infections are at Batavia, where 104 people in total have tested positive during the pandemic.

Batavia staff have been asking New York health officials for vaccines since January, but haven’t got them, according to Wednesday’s filing. If ICE won’t release people eligible for the vaccine, Prisoners’ Legal Services of New York has proposed booking appointments for clients at vaccination sites. ICE would then be responsible for taking people to the appointments. 

The government called that plan “unworkable” in its Wednesday brief. “Not only would such transportation pose a logistical problem for [Batavia] staff,” the government argued, “but the danger to the public and risk of flight by detainees would also be prohibitive, given that such vaccination sites are often in wide-open buildings, with dozens, if not hundreds, of persons present.”

The idea that it can’t take people to vaccine appointments because they’ll run away or attack someone is absurd. ICE detention is civil detention, meaning that detainees are not being held for criminal offenses. About half of people in ICE custody this fiscal year have had no criminal history. Many more have had convictions for minor offenses. Those with more serious criminal histories have already served their time. ICE routinely takes people to hospitals and immigration courtrooms, usually in shackles.

Despite not allowing lawyers to book vaccine appointments or providing vaccinations within the detention center, the government argues that Batavia detainees are not “being deprived of a meaningful chance to obtain the vaccine.” Vilardo was highly skeptical of that claim. He suggested the government was actually arguing that taking people to get vaccinated was too much of an inconvenience.

Peng, an Immigrant Justice Corps Fellow at Prisoners’ Legal Services, said his clients were being deprived of their constitutional rights by being detained without access to a vaccine they are eligible for under New York guidelines. Judge Vilardo agreed, saying that it was a constitutional violation to hold vulnerable individuals in a facility where it is impossible for them to get a vaccine that protects them from a life-threatening virus.

Vilardo was hesitant to order ICE to release detainees who are eligible for the vaccine, saying “I’m not a cowboy.” He directed Prisoners’ Legal Services to try to make appointments for its clients and provide a plan for the government to respond to by Monday. There will be another hearing next Thursday.

“These folks deserve a chance to get this vaccine,” Vilardo said. “I’m not going to let the United States ignore them.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate