As Corporate America Comes Out for Voting Rights, Where’s Next?

Georgia could be the opening shot of a nationwide battle.

Voters line up in Austin in October. Mario Cantu/CSM/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Thursday morning, Sen. Marco Rubio shared a video of himself insulting Delta Airlines officials as “woke corporate hypocrites” because the company had issued a statement opposing a new law that will make it harder for many Georgians to vote. In a strange line of logic, the Florida senator seemed to argue that the law, which among other restrictions bans non-poll-workers from distributing water to waiting voters, was not as bad as genocide against Uighur Muslims in China, where Delta also does business, and therefore should not be subject to the company’s reproach. “They make billions of dollars in a country that doesn’t even have elections…and they don’t say a word about it,” Rubio argued, “but in America they’re prepared to boycott a state and condemn them publicly…They’re hypocrites.”

Other right-wingers soon piled on. Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi argued that Coca-Cola, which, like Delta, is based in Atlanta, was “caving to the ‘woke’ left” by condemning the Georgia law. “Unelected, multinational corporations are now openly attacking sovereign U.S. states & the right of their citizens to secure their own elections,” Stephen Miller, a White House adviser to Donald Trump, added on Twitter. “This is a corporate ambush on Democracy.”

Georgia looks to just be the opening salvo in a confrontation between top Republican officials and big corporations over voter suppression measures this year: Lawmakers in dozens of states are now considering similar bills, and Black activists, worried about the potential impact on their communities’ votes, are pushing corporate executives to take a stand. Next up after Georgia could be Texas, where the state Senate passed a bill Thursday that would, among other steps, impose statewide limits on polling-place hours and ban widely used ballot drop boxes. Later that day, American Airlines and Dell, both based in Texas, put out statements opposing the state’s new bill. “Instead of seeking to limit access, governments should provide innovative pathways for citizens to have their voices heard,” Dell said in a statement. “We are strongly opposed to this bill and others like it,” American Airlines added. Texas Republican Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who supports these voter restrictions after Trump baselessly claimed voter fraud led to President Biden’s victory, promptly returned fire. “Texans are fed up with corporations that don’t share our values trying to dictate public policy,” he said in a statement.

The sparring between Republicans and corporations, to be clear, is not a result of top executives’ altruism. As the New York Times reports, Black activists pressured companies to protest the Georgia law after it passed last month, arguing that corporate America had remained far too quiet. “We are all frustrated with these companies that claim that they are standing with the Black community around racial justice and racial equality” but don’t take action, LaTosha Brown, a co-founder of Black Voters Matter, told the Times. She joined protesters on March 25 at the Atlanta airport to call for a boycott of Delta, and to urge the airline’s chief executive to use his power in the voting rights debate. “They are complicit in their silence,” she said. Bishop Reginald Jackson of the African Methodist Episcopal Church, speaking at a rally outside Georgia’s capitol that week, also threatened to boycott companies that did not take a stand. “[O]ur position is, if you can’t stand with us now, you don’t need our money, you don’t need our support,” he said.

If the Texas bill passes the House and is signed into law, it’s unclear if Dell or other companies that oppose it are prepared to take additional steps. It’s also unclear exactly where else the battle will go—though with 361 measures that would restrict voting access being pushed in 47 states, the possibilities are considerable.

As these feuds continue, Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock of Georgia, a Black pastor who was elected in January after Georgia’s progressives came out to the polls in big numbers, hopes companies don’t back down. “I’ve seen these corporations falling over themselves every year around the time of the King holiday, celebrating Dr. King,” Warnock said last weekend. “The way to celebrate Dr. King is to stand up for what he represented: voting rights.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate