Pennsylvania Supreme Court Overturns Bill Cosby’s Conviction

Gilbert Carrasquillo/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court overturned Bill Cosby’s sexual assault conviction on Wednesday, ruling that a decision by a previous prosecutor not to bring sexual assault charges against Cosby in 2005 should have prevented him from facing charges in 2015.

Cosby, 83, was convicted of drugging and sexually assaulting Andrea Constand, a former Temple University women’s basketball official, at his home in 2004. He was sentenced to 3 to 10 years in prison, and has served more than two years of that sentence.

The former comedian has been accused of sexual misconduct, including rape, by at least 60 women.

Constand first reported that Cosby sexually assaulted her to the police in 2005. But in that case, then-Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor decided not to bring charges against Cosby, explaining that he did not believe the charges could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt—in part because Constand had not reported the assault to police immediately. (Earlier this year, Castor represented former President Donald Trump during his second impeachment trial.) 

By declining to prosecute Cosby in 2005, Castor opened the door for Constand to sue Cosby. When she did, Cosby was “forced to testify…without the benefit of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination,” Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice David Wecht wrote in his decision. In depositions in the case that remained sealed for years, Cosby made incriminating statements—including that he had drugged other women with Quaaludes. He later settled Constand’s lawsuit for $3.38 million.

Years later, when a judge unsealed the old depositions and dozens of other women came forward with allegations of being sexually assaulted by Cosby, another district attorney—Risa Vetri Ferman—reopened the investigation into Constand’s allegations, and her successor, Kevin Steele, charged Cosby with three counts of aggravated indecent assault in connection with them. The case was allowed to proceed after the judge ruled that there was no formal agreement not to prosecute Cosby in 2005. The first jury deadlocked, and in Cosby’s second trial, more women with allegations against Cosby were allowed to testify

In his appeal, Cosby’s lawyers made two arguments: that those women should not have been allowed to testify and improperly biased the jury against him, and that the 2015 charges never should have been brought in the first place, due to Castor’s decision in 2005. On Wednesday morning, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed that Cosby should not have faced the 2015 charges. And it ordered that Cosby will not face another retrial. He will be released from prison today.

Read the court’s decision here:

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate