The Indiana County Known for Its Historic HIV Outbreak Just Voted to Shut Down Its Needle Exchange

“This is another perfect example of why politicians should not have control over public health programs.”

The entrance to the syringe exchange in Austin, IndianaTyler Stewart/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Among public health experts, Scott County, Indiana is a case study in how syringe exchange programs can transform a community. In 2015, the rural county made national news when it experienced a historic HIV outbreak, fueled largely by needle sharing among intravenous drug users. All told, 235 residents became infected in a county of 24,000. After then-governor Mike Pence reluctantly approved the state’s first syringe exchange as part of an emergency measure, HIV rates plummeted. In 2020, the county saw just one new infection. 

But on Wednesday evening, in a 2-1 vote, county commissioners decided to shut down the thriving exchange in a move that public health experts worry will leave residents vulnerable to yet another outbreak of HIV and other infectious diseases.

“This is another perfect example of why politicians should not have control over public health programs,” said Robin Pollini, West Virginia University epidemiology professor. “No politician should have the power to condemn an entire community to an HIV outbreak.”

The commissioners opting to shut down the program point to the age-old, unfounded logic that the syringe exchange promotes drug use. In a since-deleted Facebook post, Commissioner Randy Julian referred to the program as a “welfare program for addicts,” reports NPR. “It was brought in here and it did its job on what it should have done, but now it’s time to move on and fight it in a different way and get people off the addiction instead of handing them needles,” Julian told the AP. “That just doesn’t do it.”

Julian’s proclamations contradict decades of research, which have found that syringe exchange programs dramatically reduce overdose rates and disease transmission and increase entry to detox programs. Many syringe exchanges, like Scott County’s, also offer medical services, connections to rehab and other social services, and infectious disease screening.

Dr. William Cooke, who was until recently the only primary care doctor in Austin, Indiana, the town at the heart of the 2015 outbreak, says the syringe exchange played a key role in getting individuals struggling with addiction into his office. Before the program opened, he says, “it was so hard trying to help people living in the shadows, having no way to be seen. People need that build up—that harm reduction, that connection with people who care about them.” With the shutdown, which is scheduled for January 2022, “my fear is that when people don’t have access to sterile syringes, they’re going to use whatever is available to them,” says Cooke.

The commissioners’ decision is the latest in a spate of anti-syringe exchange legislation across the country. In West Virginia, which is currently experiencing an HIV outbreak that the CDC has deemed “the most concerning in the United States,” policymakers recently voted to impose strict restrictions on needle exchange. 

In recent years, HIV infections have fallen across the country. But they’ve risen dramatically among white intravenous drug users, who make up the primary demographic of syringe exchange clients in places like Scott County. In 2019, there were 1,148 new HIV diagnoses among white IV drug users across the country. That’s a 66 percent increase over just seven years. 

Dan Ciccarone, an epidemiologist at University of San Francisco-California, notes that, amid soaring overdose rates from opioids and stimulants like methamphetamine, “Now is not the time to stop evidence based prevention programs.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate