Biden Gave His Most Impassioned Speech on Voting Rights Yet. But He Failed to Even Mention the Filibuster.

Though expected, voting rights advocates are certain to be disappointed by the president’s speech.

Evan Vucci/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In his most high-profile speech yet on voting rights, President Biden on Tuesday sought to make the moral case for voter protections amid the threat posed by GOP-backed voter suppression bills sweeping the country. “This 21st century Jim Crow assault is real, it’s unrelenting, and we’re going to challenge it vigorously,” he said. But missing from his impassioned remarks was the one thing voting rights advocates say is impeding the passage of congressional legislation to halt the wave of restrictive voting efforts: the filibuster. 

“Some things in America should be simple and straightforward,” Biden said from Philadelphia’s National Constitution Center. “Perhaps the most important of those things, the most fundamental of those things, is the right to vote. The right to vote freely.” He also indirectly blasted former President Donald Trump’s relentless, false claims that the 2020 election had been stolen from him. “The big lie is just thatā€”a big lie.”

“You don’t call facts fake just because you’re unhappy,” he continued. “That’s not statesmanship, that’s selfishness. That’s not democracy.”

As expected though, the president stopped short of calling for an end to the Senate’s filibuster rules, even after Republicans filibustered a vote on debating the For the People Act, the Democrats sweeping democracy reform bill, in late June. Instead, Biden largely punted to Congress, saying that it was up to lawmakers to pass the For the People Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, legislation he said he would sign if passed. In his speech Tuesday, Biden called the passage of the For the People Act a “national imperative,” but also said, “we have to be clear-eyed about the obstruction we face.” As an alternative to congressional legislation, the president also pointed to the Justice Department’s role in his plan to protect voters’ rights, but their lawsuit against Georgia faces an uphill battle after the Supreme Court’s severely weakened the remaining section of the Voting Rights Act.

In addition to denouncing laws making it harder to vote, Biden took aim at a flurry of laws that subvert traditional election administration and could make it easier for Republicans to overturn election results in states like Georgia. “Democracy or autocracy: thatā€™s what itā€™s coming down to,” Biden said.

Biden’s remarks, while his most extensive to date denouncing voter suppression, are still likely to disappoint voting rights advocates who have called on Biden to go one step further and call to eliminate the filibuster, which raises the votes required to advance legislation from a 51 to a 60-vote threshold. Critics of the filibuster say that it allows minority parties to block highly popular legislation, such as the For the People Act, that would otherwise pass with a simple majorityā€”and is therefore anti-democratic. In recent weeks, voting rights advocates have also questioned whether Biden has been inordinately focused on his jobs and infrastructure plan. Texas Democrats who fled the state on Monday to block a sweeping GOP voter suppression bill have called on Senate Democrats to exempt voting rights legislation from the filibuster, an idea that an increasing number of high-profile Democratsā€”such as House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn – are embracing. 

“We’d like for him to fight for voting rights as hard as theyā€™ve been fighting for infrastructure,” Ezra Levin, co-executive director of Indivisible, said ahead of Tuesday’s speech. “They’ve probably spent one-hundredth of the political capital on democracy as they’ve spent on infrastructure.” 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate