Trump’s DC Hotel Just Banished a Reporter—Forever

Was it something he wrote?

zz/KGC-375/STAR MAX/IPx/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

No one knows DC’s Trump International Hotel quite like Mother Jones contributor Zach Everson. Now a reporter for Forbes covering money and politics, he used to run an indispensable newsletter called 1600 Pennsylvania during the Trump years, chronicling all the sycophants, favor-seekers, influence-peddlers, and grifters who frequented the hotel to pay tribute—literally—to then-President Trump. You could often spot Zach hunting for notable guests in the lobby or posting up at the very overpriced bar. He was at the hotel so often that he was on a first name basis with the general manager.

Last fall, Zach penned a revealing feature on the hotel for this magazine. One of the running themes was that the November election posed a make-or-break moment not just for Trump, but for his hotel, housed in a historic property administered by the General Services Administration. He wrote:

If he loses, his prized hotel could easily revert to what it was before his 2016 win—discounted and empty. The sycophants, the Levs and Igors, the One America News Network propagandists, the Nigerian politicians, the America First Action fundraisers, the bankers jetting in from Oklahoma, and the White House staffers and administration alums will be gone. As will the Trump-appointed lackeys at the GSA currently overseeing his lease and approval of its possible sale.

Oh, and Joe Biden will be Trump’s new landlord.

And now, here we are.

The Trumps put the hotel on the market prior to the election for the outlandishly high price of $500 million—and that was merely for the right to take over Trump’s lease on the building, not to own it. Then COVID hit, decimating the hospitality (hotel) industry—and the Trump Organization yanked the hotel off the market. The company put the hotel back on sale earlier this summer. That was before New York City District Attorney Cy Vance charged the Trump Organization and its chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg, with tax fraud, which might be a little issue for potential buyers. 

Back to Zach. He visited the hotel Thursday night, intrigued by a spike in room rates, which usually indicate a big event the Trump Org is trying to capitalize on—for instance, a Big Lie-themed rally that leads to an insurrection. In a piece posted earlier at Forbes, Zach explained:

The rates that night started at $2,400, well above the usual $400 to $700, and I wanted to find out why. Upon entering, I saw a big sign that read “Arrow Exterminators.” I confirmed that the exterminators were customers rather than contractors, and, with that assignment checked, settled in at the bar to see if any swamp people of note were still showing up with Trump out of power.  

During Trump’s presidency, the Embassy of Kuwait held parties at the DC hotel. Now the hotel is apparently hosting pest control galas, which neatly sums up the downward trajectory Zach predicted.

Anyway, he sipped a $17 proseco and snapped a few pictures of the scene in the lobby. Seeing no notables, he prepared to leave, making a pit stop in the restroom. When he exited, the hotel’s director of security, Ernest Wojciech, beckoned Zach over and told him he was being ejected from the hotel—for good.

According to Zach, Wojciech told him the offense that earned him this grave punishment was taking pictures in the hotel. That explanation is a bit of a head-scratcher, considering the place is (or at least was) basically a Republican hype house, an Instagram backdrop for MAGA-types displaying their featly to Trump.

The Trump Organization’s general manager, Mickael Damelincourt, has yet to respond to an inquiry about why the hotel took the extraordinary step of banning a reporter for life, or at least for the lifetime of the hotel, which may be considerably shorter. (I will update this post if we hear back.) 

Perhaps hotel officials were piqued that Zach revealed that hotel denizens, sick of the expensive drinks in the lobby bar, were pre-gaming at a local dive called Harry’s. 

Additional reporting by Russ Choma. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate