The Texas Abortion Ban Didn’t Pass in a Vacuum

The state legislature’s body of work is the story of what today’s Republican Party is for.

texas abortion protest

Bob Daemmrich/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Senate Bill 8, the Texas law that effectively bans abortions in the state by criminalizing any procedures after six weeks, is a bad law, not just in the sense that it accomplishes a bad thing—by effectively depriving women of their formerly constitutionally protected rights—but in the sense that it was written with all the legal authority of a ransom note. The law, in addition to the ban itself, proposes to enforce this prohibition by creating what Justice Sonia Sotomayor describes as “citizen bounty hunters.” Private citizens can earn $10,000 by filing a lawsuit against anyone who has so much as offered a ride to someone else to get to an abortion clinic in Texas. Unlike traditional litigation, a plaintiff in one of these cases would not need to demonstrate that they have been harmed to receive this fee. It’s simply a harassment stipend; if you see something, we’ll pay you something. When the law passed the legislature this spring, even some of its own supporters thought it might be unconstitutional.

But SB 8 was not the only major piece of legislation that came out of the Texas legislature this year. On Wednesday, the Houston Chronicle helpfully rounded up other bills that have gone into effect or will soon. It is not pretty:

  • Anyone over 21 in the state without a criminal record can now open-carry a firearm—no need for a permit or any sort of training.
  • Protesters who block freeways will now face felony charges. 
  • Homeless encampments are now illegal. 
  • Voting access was significantly curtailed while the powers of poll watchers were significantly expanded.
  • Teachers are prohibited from teaching whatever angry parents or school boards decide is “critical race theory.” 
  • Professional sports teams are required to play the national anthem before games, under threat of losing tax subsidies if they don’t. (They should not have those subsidies in the first place, but that’s another story.)
  • And any business that requires proof of vaccination from customers could lose its operating license. 

It could be worse, I suppose: They could have put a $10,000 bounty on the restaurant owners and history teachers, too. This is a strange list, but as a mission statement of what the conservative movement is and isn’t for in 2021, it is quite coherent. The sum of these measures is an endorsement of governance as a display of cultural dominance, rather than governance as a means to make anything work better for anyone. And there is so much that doesn’t work.

Earlier this year, I wrote about how the animating ethos for much of today’s Republican Party was shitposting. The movement’s most ambitious figures, interpreting the wishes of their voters, seem more interested in the appearance of governing than in the real thing. They do loud, visible things, and spend way too much time on social media. They want what their base wants, which is to put other people in place, and they seem little interested in anything else. They pass blatantly unconstitutional laws to score a point or lodge ridiculous constitutional challenges of their own just to be seen. And then sometimes the Supreme Court just decides to let them have their way anyway, because the justices came out of this same movement too—that’s why they’re there, after all.

While the Texas legislature was doing all of those things, it was also not doing other things. It did pass a set of reforms designed to correct some of what ails the Texas power grid—such as requiring power companies to weatherize their plants—but declined, for instance, to authorize any money to pay for it or apply the same mandates to the natural-gas industry. And any improvements are not expected to be in place before 2022. The state government’s major response to the fourth wave of the coronavirus has been to strip local authorities and private businesses of their ability to do anything about it, in order to score nihilistic culture-war victories over masking and vaccines. Texas is, statistically speaking, one of the worst places in the United States to give birth, but the state’s leaders would still rather turn away free money from Washington than spend it on health care for poor people.

When the Atlantic’s Emma Green asked Texas Right to Life’s legislative director, John Seago, whether the group would advocate for Medicaid expansion to ensure that women have access to health care during and after pregnancy—supporting Medicaid expansion while limiting abortion access is the position of the governor of neighboring Louisiana—he demurred

“We have to be mindful of our political atmosphere and what is possible,” he said.

The political atmosphere in Texas is one that Texas Right to Life, and groups like it, have spent decades creating. These activists and organizations remade the federal judiciary, swung state and national elections, and changed what kinds of lives individual citizens are allowed to live. As I read up on the law, I was struck by the sick sort of irony of the bounty mechanism. For several decades, one of the most powerful forces in the state’s politics was a group called Texans for Lawsuit Reform. Though officially nonpartisan, TLR helped Republicans cement their grip on the state by lavishing campaign funds on candidates who supported tort reform—a favorite issue of the state’s conservative business leaders. Well, here we are now, staring into the abyss of conservative social policy and frivolous lawsuits all the way down.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate