CBP “Significantly Reduced” Punishments for Employees Who Joked About Migrant Deaths on Facebook

57 of the 60 agents who committed misconduct are still working face-to-face with migrants.

A Border Patrol agent searches a migrant near the US-Mexico border. Scott Olson/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A border patrol supervisor who posted an internal video of a migrant falling off a cliff to their death was recommended for removal. Instead, he ended up with a 30-day suspension. A California intelligence border patrol agent who posted “let’s get back to work, these children arent [sic] going to separate themselves” received only a one-day suspension. An agent who shared the heartbreaking image of a migrant father and child who drowned in the Rio Grande while trying to cross the border by referring to them as “floaters” was allowed to retire with disability benefits.

These are just some of the findings from a House Committee on Oversight and Reform investigation into racist, misogynistic, and violent content posted on secret Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Facebook groups showing that the agency failed to adequately discipline agents. According to the committee’s report, CBP looked into 135 employees affiliated with the groups and determined 60 agents violated the agency’s standards of conduct. But after an internal review board recommended disciplinary action, the agency sidestepped most punishments.

Only two employees were fired and most had their discipline “significantly reduced” from the original recommendation. Fifty-seven agents continue to work in positions of power over migrants, including families with children. 

The committee launched the investigation in 2019 after ProPublica first reported on a private Facebook group with 9,500 members called “I’m 10-15.” (The number is a border patrol code for “aliens in custody.”) In the groups, current and former CBP agents joked about migrant deaths and shared doctored images of Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez being sexually assaulted by Donald Trump. The House investigation states that the Trump administration obstructed the inquiry for more than a year and the agency, which had knowledge of the group’s activities since August 2016, didn’t start producing requested documents until after Trump was out of office. The findings point to “a number of failings at CBP, including an inconsistent disciplinary process, a failure to train on and enforce social media policies, and senior leadership’s failure to take appropriate actions.” 

Out of the 60 employees deemed at fault by a chief patrol agent acting as a “deciding official,” two were removed, 43 were suspended without pay, 12 received letters of reprimand, and three were issued alternate disciplinary actions such as suspension with pay. Ten employees had retired ahead of any formal actions being taken. Although the disciplinary review board recommended 24 removals from positions held within the agency or, in some instances, the federal service, only two were carried out, with 18 being reduced to suspensions without pay, one to a letter of reprimand, and another to a verbal warning.

Documents obtained by the House committee also show that two high-ranking CBP officers were members of the “I’m 10-15″ group: former Border Patrol Chiefs Carla Provost, who served between August 2018 and January 2020, and Rodney Scott, who was in charge from February 2020 to August 2021. Provost said she used Facebook to “get an unfiltered gauge on how the rank and file employees of USBP reacted to her statements” in interviews and congressional testimonies. Although she didn’t actively post derogatory content in the group, Provost, the first woman to hold that leadership job, also “did not raise any concerns about activity.” Provost and Scott, as well as chief patrol agents, an executive assistant commissioner, and investigators within the agency’s Office of Professional Responsibility also didn’t face disciplinary actions. Several employees reported that the participation of senior managers “gave them the impression that CBP leadership was aware of the group and the nature of its posts.”

“CBP’s failure to act sooner to impose discipline on employees after senior leaders became aware of the ‘I’m 10-15’ Facebook group, the lack of agency-specific disciplinary guidelines, and the inconsistent punishments it applied all weakened CBP’s ability to hold agents accountable for their misconduct,” the report concluded. In a press release, chairwoman of the committee Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney said she was troubled by CBP’s broken disciplinary process. “CBP’s failure to prevent these violent and offensive statements by its own agents or impose adequate discipline creates a serious risk that this behavior will continue. As we saw with the mistreatment of migrants by Border Patrol agents in Del Rio, Texas last month, systemic behavior problems within CBP persist. CBP must take immediate steps to reform its disciplinary processes, strengthen social media policies and training, and address longstanding issues of poor morale within its ranks.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate