Progressives Helped Biden Pass His Infrastructure Bill. But They Gave Up Their Leverage.

The Democrats’ broader agenda is still in Joe Manchin’s hands.

Mother Jones illustration; Drew Angerer/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

House progressives backed down on Friday, giving President Joe Biden a chance to claim a win—even as his party’s hopes of enacting a broader agenda wobbled.

In remarks Saturday morning, Biden said that the infrastructure bill will create millions of jobs. “Yesterday we took a monumental step forward as a nation,” he said. “And we’re just getting started.”

Progressives permitted passage of a $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill without assurance that the bigger prize they have spent months holding out for—a far-reaching package of climate, family and health provisions—will also become law.

The Senate passed the infrastructure bill, negotiated by moderate-leaning senators in both parties, in August. In the months since, progressives in the House said they would only provide the votes to pass that measure as part of a deal in which Congress also approved ambitious legislation, dubbed the “Build Back Better” act. That plan includes items like universal pre-school, four weeks of paid and family medical leave, and more than $550 billion to fight climate change, paid for with a minimum tax on all corporations and increased taxes on wealthy Americans. (Allowing the federal government to negotiate directly with pharmaceutical companies to cut drug prices is still in the mix as a possible provision in the bill.) In September, progressives blocked a vote House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) attempted to hold on to the bipartisan infrastructure bill alone.

Critics accused progressives of holding the infrastructure bill hostage to their broader agenda. Now the hostage is released. The House’s 228-206 vote, just before 11:30pm on Friday, delinks the two bills, allowing the infrastructure bill to become law, and removing whatever leverage progressives gained by preventing its passage. It passed after an intense day of legislative wrangling, heavy pressure from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), and personal lobbying by Biden.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), leader of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told reporters that the president even called her mother, in India, after successfully pushing for Jayapal and members of her caucus to support the infrastructure bill. Jayapal said her mother told her that she “just kept screaming like a little girl.” (Jayapal didn’t offer many details, but her mother seems to have been excited to hear from the president.)

Democratic leaders had hoped on Friday to vote on and pass both bills. But a group of moderate Democrats announced they would oppose the Build Back Better measure because the Congressional Budget Office had not yet assessed if the bill fulfills Democrats’ promise to offset all new spending with increased revenue. 

Pelosi left a procedural vote open all day, allowing it to become the longest recorded House vote in modern history while negotiating to resolve the impasse. Eventually, five of the moderates pledged, in a notably qualified letter, that they would “commit to voting for the Build Back Better Act, in its current form other than technical changes, as expeditiously as we receive fiscal information from the Congressional Budget Office—but in no event later than the week of November 15.”

Pelosi also held a procedural vote to start consideration of the broader act, another gesture aimed at assuring progressives that the bill will get a vote. Biden, Pelosi, and Democrats involved in talks said they agreed to trust each other.

This worked. Only six progressive members of the so-called Squad voted against the infrastructure bill. “This is bullshit,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said before opposing the bill. But Jayapal and other progressives backed the measure. Pelosi offset Democratic defections with support from 13 Republicans.

The vote was an embarrassment for House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), who tried to unify his members against the bill, and predicted it would fail. And it enraged some of the House’s most vocal conservatives.

Democrats, rattled by a decline in Biden’s approval and defeat in Virginia’s gubernatorial race last week, greeted the bill’s passage late Friday night with sustained cheers. 

“The one message that came across was ‘get something done'” Biden said Saturday when asked about the election results.

But the bill’s passage leaves most of Biden’s agenda unfulfilled. The bill includes $550 billion in new funds over 10 years for highways and bridges, expansion of broadband for internet access, and modernizing the power grid. But nearly half the bill’s cost is for renewing existing transportation spending, and it is far smaller than the $2.6 trillion plan that Biden initially proposed, leaving out $363 billion in proposed tax credits for renewable energy, among other things.

Progressives have no assurance that the Build Back Better Act will pass Congress. Nor do they have power to change that. Even if House moderates honor their pledges, that only means the measure will pass in the House. In the Senate, Democrats will try to pass the bill under budget rules that allow passage with a bare majority, preventing Republicans from blocking it by filibustering. That means Democrats need every one of their senators to vote for it, a circumstance that empowers members whose votes are not assured, prominently Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), to sink it or dictate its content. If they pass the measure at all, senators are expected to alter whatever the House approves, sending it back to the lower chamber for another vote. 

In prepared remarks Saturday, Biden said flatly that Build Back Better will pass in the House and the Senate. But in a question and answer session, he was more measured. “We’re gonna see what happens in the Senate,” he said. “And whether or not I need only Democratic votes, which is likely, and whether I can get all of them.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate