More Than 30,000 Kaiser Permanente Workers Just Announced They’ll Strike This Month

They oppose a two-tier wage plan that they say would exacerbate an existing staffing crisis.

Members of the National Union of Healthcare Workers picket the Kaiser Permanente Fontana Medical Center in 2018. James Quigg/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

More than 30,000 Kaiser Permanente workers plan to strike on November 15 if contract negotiations with the health network do not improve. Workers are fighting a proposal from Kaiser that would cut pay for future hires.

The decision to provide Kaiser with the 10-day notice required by federal labor law is a major escalation in what could soon become one of the largest health care strikes in recent history. It comes after Kaiser workers from unions across the country voted overwhelmingly last month to give union leaders the authority to call a strike. Roughly 20,000 workers are already on strike at major companies like Kellogg’s and John Deere as part of what was dubbed Striketober.

The workers who plan to strike on November 15 are members of the the United Nurses Associations of California/Union of Health Care Professionals, the Oregon Federation of Nurses and Health Professionals, and United Steelworkers Local 7600, which represents Kaiser workers in California. Another 8,000 Kaisers employees whose unions have also authorized strikes may put in their 10-day notices in the coming days.

Jodi Barschow, a Kaiser nurse who serves as the president of the Oregon Federation of Nurses and Health Professionals, said in a statement that workers had hoped Kaiser would back down after they authorized strikes and held rallies opposing the health networkā€™s plan. ā€œStriking is our last resort,ā€ Barschow said, ā€œbut it is what we must do so that we can protect our patients, our workers, and our entire public health care system from the disastrous attack Kaiser leadership is staging.ā€

Kaiser’s initial offer would have cut wages for future hires by between 26 and 39 percent. UNAC/UHCP said in a press release that the health network reduced that to a 15 percent cut in an offer made on Tuesday. Kaiser workers believe the two-tier wage system would deepen an existing staffing crisis at the network’s facilities and put patients at risk by making the nonprofit unable to recruit and retain talented workers. As I wrote last week:

There are also fears that it would lead to resentment among those paid less for the same work, or cause Kaiser to replace the more expensive workers covered by the old contract with new hires. Kaiserā€™s push for two-tier pay resembles similar proposals from Kellogg and John Deere that have already led to strikes this fall. Like Kaiser, both companies remain highly profitable…

The Alliance of Healthcare Unions, the coalition of 21 locals now considering whether to strike, has been pushing for 4 percent raises, no two-tier wage system, and contract language that ensures safe staffing levels.

Kaiser has made more than $10 billion during the pandemic. That includes $3 billion in the second quarter of 2021, most of which came from investments. In 2019, outgoing CEO Bernard Tysonā€™s pay and retirement package came to $35 million. Kaiser declined to say last month how much his replacement, Greg Adams, made last year. 

Keri Ferraro, a surgical technologist at Kaiser with 16 years of experience and a member of the bargaining team for the Oregon Federation of Nurses and Health Professionals, told me last month that sheā€™s already waited seven or eight hours to take lunch breaks because of short staffing. She fears how much worse staffing could get if a two-tier system went into effect. ā€œIt really seems like theyā€™re just trying to save money at the expense of those same health care workers they called heroes,ā€ Ferraro said.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate