Democratic Power Brokers Are Abandoning Kyrsten Sinema

And progressives like Bernie Sanders are talking about a primary challenge, too.

Rod Lamkey/CNP/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Last week, Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) took the Senate floor and announced that she would never, under any circumstances, vote to curtail the filibuster. It dealt a coup de grace to what could be the Democrats’ last (and best) chance at federal voting rights reform, enraged Arizona organizers who worked to get her elected in 2018, and fell squarely in line with her self-appointed role as the avatar of Senate obstructionism

Five days later, the backlash from progressives and party activists started to arrive. The powerful pro-choice Democratic group EMILY’s List, one of Sinema’s top financial backers, announced on Tuesday that it would no longer support the senator in future elections if she continues to block the voting legislation.

“Right now, Sen. Sinema’s decision to reject the voices of allies, partners and constituents who believe the importance of voting rights outweighs that of an arcane process means she will find herself standing alone in the next election,” wrote the organization’s president, Laphonza Butler, in a public statement

Hours after EMILY’s List released its statement, reproductive rights group NARAL issued a similar announcement, saying that it wouldn’t endorse “any U.S. Senator who doesn’t support changing the Senate rules to pass voting rights legislation.” 

Both EMILY’s List and NARAL justified the change to their endorsement criteria with similar logic, claiming that voting rights and abortion rights are “inextricably linked.” 

“Electing Democratic pro-choice women is not possible without free and fair elections,” wrote Butler. “Protecting the right to choose is not possible without access to the ballot box.” 

Sinema’s stance on voting rights has also energized a longstanding debate among liberals about whether to mount a primary challenge against her in 2024. The Primary Sinema PAC, which aims to throw the senator out of office, told Politico that donations soared the day of her Senate speech rejecting filibuster reform. Run Ruben Run, a group dedicated to drafting Arizona Congressman Ruben Gallego for a primary challenge, also saw its daily donations quadruple. In addition, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont), one of the most popular progressive politicians in the nation, told the Associated Press that he’d consider supporting a potential primary challenger against her. 

It’s become apparent that Sinema, once a radical Green Party activist and Ralph Nader devotee, has alienated vast swaths of the liberal base. Even seasoned Arizona politics watchers have expressed utter confusion about her 2024 reelection game plan. Is there a path for a pro-business centrist who’s lost the backing of Democratic activists and whose brand centers around obstructing some of the most popular elements of the party’s platform? Opinion polls seem to indicate no. In October, the progressive polling group Data for Progress reported that Sinema’s net approval rating among likely primary voters stands at a breathtaking negative-45 percentage points. All the terrible publicity she’s gotten over the last two months only stands to exacerbate her poor stature among the party faithful. 

Who knows how things will shape up over the next two years, but at the moment, Sinema’s commitment to obstructionism seems to run contrary not only to democratic principles but also simple self-preservation.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate