NY Attorney General: Evidence Suggests Trump “Fraudulently Valued” His Assets

Letitia James wants a judge to compel the former president and his children to cooperate with her investigation.

Former President Donald Trump pauses as he speaks at a rally Saturday, Jan. 15, 2022, in Florence, Ariz. AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

New York Attorney General Letitia James has escalated her investigation into former President Donald Trump’s business practices, telling a judge that she has evidence that the Trump Organization gave lenders and insurance companies incorrect information about the value of his properties for years and that she now needs the court’s help to force Trump and his adult children to cooperate in the probe. 

Trump has a long record as a self-promoter who has offered wildly different assessments of his own net wealth and the size of his various properties. For example, on 9/11 he claimed that after the Twin Towers fell, his 40 Wall Street tower was the tallest building in New York when it definitely wasn’t even close. But in the instances outlined by James, the alleged misstatements are potentially quite serious. They were made in annual statements of financial condition—a document regularly prepared by the Trump Organization to assure financial partners about the status of Trump’s company. James’ filing says that “the evidence to date indicates that banks and other financial institutions relied on Mr. Trump’s financial statements in considering whether to grant Mr. Trump and the Trump Organization access to credit and coverage.” If Trump knew he was giving incorrect numbers and deceiving his lenders and insurance companies into giving him better terms or more money than he deserved, it could amount to fraud.

It’s been no secret that James is interested in the inner workings of the Trump Organization—or that Trump and his children weren’t being cooperative. But in the filing late Tuesday night, James laid out what she knows in very specific detail. James’ office included at least 268 exhibits, most of which were sealed. Based on their descriptions, those documents seem to include emails and letters sent by Trump or his children Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr., as well as correspondence between the Trump Organization and financial institutions like Duetsche Bank. Some of the material appears to relate to the financing Trump received for his projects in Washington, DC, and Chicago.

In the early stages of James’ investigation, the Trump Organization was reportedly cooperative and provided documents and executives to talk with the AG’s office. But shortly before the 2020 election, the company seems to have stopped voluntarily cooperating. Eric Trump attempted to avoid talking to James’ investigators, though he eventually relented when a judge rejected his claims that the interview was politically motivated. Last month, however, Trump filed a lawsuit against James seeking to block her from interviewing him, Ivanka Trump, and Donald Trump Jr. and called the whole investigation a politically motivated fishing expedition.

“For more than two years, the Trump Organization has used delay tactics and litigation in an attempt to thwart a legitimate investigation into its financial dealings,” James said in a statement Tuesday night. “Thus far in our investigation, we have uncovered significant evidence that suggests Donald J. Trump and the Trump Organization falsely and fraudulently valued multiple assets and misrepresented those values to financial institutions for economic benefit.”

James recently flirted with a run for governor but in early December announced she would not join the race. Still, in their lawsuit against James, the Trumps have asserted, even after she said she wouldn’t run, that her investigation was politically motivated. In a statement released by the Trump Organization on Wednesday, the family mocked the investigation as a campaign stunt.

“The only one misleading the public is Letitia James. She defrauded New Yorkers by basing her entire candidacy on a promise to get Trump at all costs without having seen a shred of evidence and in violation of every conceivable ethical rule,” the statement reads. “Three years later she is now faced with the stark reality that she has no case. So, in response to Trump suing her and filing multiple ethical complaints, and on the heels of her failed governor’s race, she has no choice but to mislead the public yet again by misrepresenting the facts and ignoring her own inflammatory comments. Her allegations are baseless and will be vigorously defended.”

James’ new filing includes fairly detailed allegations that the Trump Organization regularly presented different sets of numbers about how much various properties were worth. For example, James says the Trump Organization created statements of financial condition that showed that the Trump Tower triplex that was Trump’s main residence before becoming president was worth as much as $327 million and based that figure on the fact that the apartment was 30,000 square feet. But the apartment is allegedly nowhere near that size—James says that Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg testified that it was only about 10,000 square feet and that the $327 million evaluation was inflated by “give or take” $200 million.

James’ filing contends that other misstatements in the Trump Organization’s statements of financial condition include:

  • Claiming in 2011 that Trump’s Abderdeen golf course in northeastern Scotland was worth $161 million, a claim that, according to the attorney general, appears to have been based not on any actual legitimate property appraisal, but rather information compiled to send to a reporter for an article in Forbes
  • Claiming in 2016 that the Abderdeen golf course was now worth $435.6 million, citing plans to build as many as 2,500 luxury homes, even though local zoning and planning officials had made it clear they would allow no more than 1,500 to be built. (None have been built so far.)
  • Tacking on an additional 15 to 30 percent onto the estimated value of seven golf courses based on their affiliation with the Trump brand, even though financial institutions that were sent the valuations specifically requested numbers that did not include estimates of “brand value.”
  • Giving the Internal Revenue Service incorrect information about the value of land donated or put into conservation at his upstate New York and Los Angeles properties.
  • After a lender valued Trump’s 40 Wall Street office building as being worth no more than $220 million, Trump refinanced the property with another lender—which employed Weisselberg’s son—where the building was then given a valuation of $550 million, a figure James’ filing says was not a “good-faith” assessment. On his next statement of financial condition, Trump allegedly listed the property as being worth $730 million.

In her filing, James asked the judge in the case for help compelling Trump, Ivanka Trump, and Donald Trump Jr. to testify. Through 2016, James says, Trump himself signed off on the accuracy of the financial statements sent to banks and insurance companies and Trump Jr. certified the documents stating the value of the trust that holds all of his father’s assets. James says she wants to talk to Ivanka Trump because, before her father became president, she served as the Trump Organization’s main point of contact with its largest lender, Deutsche Bank. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate