Virginia School Boards Sue to Stop Glenn Youngkin’s Order Making Masks Optional

The order allows parents to circumvent school board requirements and send their children to school unmasked.

Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin campaigns in northern Virginia.Brian Cahn/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The day Glenn Youngkin assumed office as the governor of Virginia, he signed an executive order allowing parents to circumvent local school district requirements and send their children to school unmasked. The order immediately sparked pushback from some parents, public health experts, and Virginia pediatricians, who issued a collective statement urging continued mask-wearing in schools. 

The controversy came to a boil on January 24, the day the order was scheduled to come into effect, when seven Virginia school districts filed suit, asking an Arlington court to declare that Youngkin’s order violated the state constitution. 

ā€œWithout todayā€™s action, school boards are placed in a legally untenable positionā€”faced with an executive order that is in conflict with the constitution and state law,ā€ the complaint reads. The executive order, the plaintiffs argued, has created “a situation in which the School Boards face the real and imminent threat of having COVID-19 outbreaks occur at multiple schools, endangering the health of students and staff, and causing those schools at least temporarily to be shut down.”

The school board’s complaint particularly emphasizes the fact that some students are too young (under five) to receive Covid-19 vaccines, and that all seven school districts serve immunocompromised students and teachers. Data indicates that children are less likely than adults to get severely ill or die from the coronavirus. However, according to the Washington Post, 3.4 million children have tested positive since September, which will no doubt translate into adult infections and deaths. 

Lawyers for the school boards argue that Youngkin’s order contradicts Virginia’s constitution, which vests “the supervision of schools” in each division’s school board, and a state law passed last spring, which mandates that Virginia school districts follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s federal guidelines “to the maximum extent possible.” The CDC strongly recommends that all students, K-12, wear masks regardless of vaccination status. 

Youngkin, on the other hand, has cast his executive order as an attempt to “empower parents.” In a tweet over the weekend acknowledging the controversy, he urged Virginia parents “to listen to school principals, and to trust the legal process.”

Youngkin, who was helped to victory in part by a conservative backlash to mask and vaccine mandates (as well as race-conscious and LGBTQ-friendly teaching material and policies), appears to be making good on his pledge to roll back public health measures across the state. Although polls have found that a majority of Virginians support mask mandates, a vocal minority of parents have strongly resisted Covid restrictions. Shortly after Youngkin signed the executive order, a woman was arrested for allegedly threatening Page County school board members, saying that she would bring “every single gun loaded” to prevent her children from having to wear masks. (The woman later apologized, claiming that she was speaking off the cuff and wasn’t referring to actual firearms.) 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate