The Big Lie Is Tearing Wisconsin’s GOP Apart

Infighting over the 2020 race could tank Republicans’ hopes for November.

State Rep. Timothy Ramthun listens to Gov. Tony Evers' State of the State address in February.Andy Manis/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Even if most Republicans still think Donald Trump was the real winner of the 2020 presidential race, they seem, by and large, to accept that President Biden is now in office—or at least that their opportunity to decertify the election is long past.

Not so in Wisconsin, where some Republicans’ obsession with overturning the 2020 election continues to divide their party, elevating fringe candidates, alienating establishment ones, and threatening the state GOP’s chances in the upcoming midterm elections.

Take longtime State Assembly speaker Rep. Robin Vos, a Republican whom some county party leaders have demanded resign for his alleged failure to investigate (nonexistent) voter fraud in 2020. In a radio appearance Friday, Vos spent nearly an hour explaining that it’s too late to turn back the clock on the election, the New York Times reports. “It is impossible—it cannot happen,” he said. “I don’t know how many times I can say that.”

But the party’s internal tensions could particularly endanger its hopes for the coming gubernatorial election, in which Republicans hope to oust Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, a thorn in the side of the GOP-led state legislature. Last weekend, conspiracy theorist and state Rep. Timothy Ramthun entered the primary race with the express goal of overturning the 2020 election (and the support of MyPillow guy Mike Lindell). But Ramthun’s presence in the primary is more than a bizarro footnote—it’s actually pushing his Republican opponents to even greater conspiratorial extremes. Back in September, Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch, the state GOP’s preferred candidate, acknowledged that Biden won in 2020. Last week, she started dodging the question.

Now, Republicans in the state—including the hugely unpopular Republican Sen. Ron Johnson, up for reelection this year—fear that the party’s internecine fighting will become the reason it misses out on the nationwide red wave anticipated for November’s midterms. But Ramthun’s candidacy begs another question: If he wins the election, will he consider the results legitimate?

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate