Amid Union Drive, Howard Schultz Is Back in Charge of Starbucks

CEO Kevin Johnson is retiring after Starbucks lost six of seven recent union elections.

Starbucks founder Howard Schultz at Arizona State University in 2019.Brian Cahn/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

When companies are flailing, the founder comes back. It’s happened at Apple, at Tinder, and at Twitter. Now Starbucks is joining the list. On Wednesday, the company announced that CEO Kevin Johnson will retire and be replaced on an interim basis by founder Howard Schultz.

But unlike Apple and other tech companies that have reinstated CEOs, Starbucks is bringing back Schultz with company revenues near record highs. The crisis it faces is not a lack of profit, but a union drive.

Workers at 143 Starbucks locations across dozens of states have now filed for union elections. Workers United, the SEIU affiliate they are trying to join, has won six of the seven elections held so far. Those workers have won despite a union-busting campaign from Starbucks that has involved retaliating against pro-union employees, hiring dozens of high-paid lawyers to try to delay elections, and visits from top Starbucks officials to stores that have petitioned for union elections. Starbucks’ playbook hasn’t been working. Its leaders seem spooked. 

Starbucks board member Mellody Hobson told CNBC Wednesday morning that Schultz is “singularly capable” of engaging with Starbucks workers. Hobson seems to mean that she believes he’ll be capable of stopping them from unionizing. 

Hobson told the Wall Street Journal that Johnson’s departure has been in the works for about a year, well before the union drive began. “It’s been deliberate,” she said. “This is not hasty in any way.” But Johnson’s retirement didn’t require bringing back Schultz.

If Schultz is singularly capable of dealing with workers, he’ll need to do a better job than he has so far. In November, he went to Buffalo to address workers from the stores that sparked the union drive. The speech created a backlash. Schultz, who is Jewish, told a story about how people forced on to trains to Nazi concentration camps shared the few blankets that were given to them. “So much of that story is threaded into what we’ve tried to do at Starbucks is share our blanket,” he explained. Most workers in Buffalo went on to vote in favor of unionization.

Forbes puts Schultz’s net worth at about $4 billion. Starbucks’ share price jumped after news broke that Schultz was coming back. Forbes estimates that he has made $115 million since Tuesday because he owns about three percent of the company. An entry-level Starbucks worker would have to work for more than 3,600 years to make that much money.

Schultz was long viewed as one of the “good capitalists” by progressive elites who cited things like the company’s above average health care benefits and the free college tuition offered to employees through a partnership with Arizona State University. His standing was so solid inside the Beltway that Hillary Clinton reportedly planned to make him secretary of labor if she had won in 2016.

Four years later, President Joe Biden picked Boston Mayor Marty Walsh, a former union leader, to be Labor Secretary after pledging to be the most pro-union president in history. Schultz, meanwhile, was no longer calling himself a Democrat. The times had changed. Now, much to Schultz’s dismay, Starbucks workers are changing them some more.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate