Australian Election Results: Revenge of the Barbecued Koalas

Voters just kicked out the conservative government and climate action is back.

Freder/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

It was a koala massacre. Two years ago, Australia’s worst wildfire crisis left an unprecedented number of the country’s cherished wildlife charred or dead, among them tens of thousands of koalas. Photos of our iconic marsupial with barbecued paws shocked the world. In large parts of Eastern Australia, koalas are now endangered.

On Saturday, as the country went to the ballot box for a national election, I couldn’t shake those images of destruction and what they foretold for a country increasingly swept by extreme climate disasters. I wasn’t alone.

Australia resoundingly turfed out its conservative government on Saturday after the ruling coalition led by Scott Morrison sustained brutal losses across a wide swathe of districts. While votes were still being counted into the early hours of Sunday morning in Australia, it became clear that “ScoMo,” as he’s known, simply didn’t have the numbers to form a government, even in a minority. That honor will go to the center-left Labor party and its leader, Anthony Albanese, who will become the country’s 31st prime minister. The election ends nine years of conservative governments that have low-balled climate commitments and underplayed the urgency facing a continent uniquely vulnerable to global warming.

It remains to be seen what kind of government Albanese, dubbed “Albo” by Aussies, can pull together, but an outright parliamentary majority remains a possibility. While a Labor victory was long predicted by national polls, the battle was always going to be fought across a string of swing districts on bread-and-butter economic issues like inflation and wage growth. Labor seized districts from conservatives across the country, riding a strong anti-Morrison wave. But there was a big twist this election cycle: A field of so-called “teal” independent candidates focused on climate change appeared poised to topple top conservatives in key blue-ribbon constituencies in Sydney and Melbourne, helping erode the government’s numbers and position Labor for victory. These “teals” put climate action and anti-corruption reform at the top of their agenda, and their efforts were backed by unusually fierce grassroots activism. The smaller climate-focused Greens also enjoyed its best-ever election results by winning two seats in the country’s lower house, with two more in active contention. Added up, this is a potentially game-changing result that could open a rare hopeful chapter in Australia’s ongoing dramas over climate action, which have contributed to a head-spinning crisis in political leadership over the last decade.

“Together we can end the climate wars,” Albanese said in his victory speech in Sydney. “Together we can take advantage of the opportunity for Australia to be a renewable energy superpower.”

Scott Morrison will likely be remembered as a thin-skinned spin doctor who couldn’t spin his mistakes hard enough to win another election. He confessed to messing up Australia’s vaccine roll-out, which had the effect of extending tough Covid prevention measures, and promised to reform his “bulldozer” leadership style if reelected. Across his time in office, ScoMo and his conservative colleagues remained unmoved, both in policy and tone, by a brutal series of extreme disasters that beset the country. His late-campaign promise to allow new homeowners to use their retirement funds to buy into Australia’s overheated housing market wasn’t enough to woo voters. Analyzing losses in some traditional conservative heartlands will present ScoMo’s party, which tilted even further rightwards in recent years, a painful postmortem.

This was anything but an inspiring campaign season. Australians received a steady diet of negative partisanship and mudslinging across six weeks of dreary election pageantry. But if there’s one message I’m taking away from the early results: The climate wars that have dominated Australian politics just got a reset. Two weeks ago I wondered if the image of burned koalas during Australia’s wildfire crisis would be enough to sway Australians to make different choices.

There are more votes to be counted, and more trends to be analyzed. But, for now, I’m ready to call it: This one’s for the koalas.

This post has been updated with election results as they became available.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate