We’re Living Through the Backlash

Two years on, George Floyd’s death has culminated in stalled reforms and a reinvigorated, revanchist right.

Richard Tsong-Taatarii/Star-Tribune/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Two years ago today, former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin pressed his knee into George Floyd’s neck for nine minutes and 29 seconds.

The murder outraged the public, setting off a summer of pepper spray, rubber bullets, and torched police vehicles. It was a time of mourning and recrimination that also seemed to contain a real sense of possibility. People of all races, across the nation, joined rallies against police brutality. The Overton window seemed briefly to widen, with criminal justice advocates releasing wish lists of reforms that had previously been unthinkable. One of them became notorious: defunding the police. 

Democratic lawmakers rushed to channel the energy of the protests into the upcoming elections. Conservative media figures thundered about lawlessness and warned their viewers that the dark-skinned figures on the screen would “come for you.” The left saw an opportunity for systemic change. 

But for all the cries of the dangers of defunding the police, and of the radical agenda set off by the rage of two summers ago, we have not seen much concrete progress. In fact, we’ve often seen the opposite. Just as the radical edge of the 1960s sowed fear and spurred on the organization of a conservative movement—one that arose in the 1970s and attained full power in the next decade—we are again seeing the rise of a political force ruthlessly opposed to any attempt to create a different, more equal America.

That is to say, two years on, it’s clear: The backlash has arrived. 

  • Conservative state legislatures have passed laws making it illegal to teach children about America’s long history of Black subjugation. Others have criminalized the right to protest with some even making it legal for drivers, in specific conditions, to run over protesters. 
  • New York City, a progressive stronghold and the site of some of 2020’s fiercest marches, elected a former cop as its mayor who has reinstated the plainclothes unit disproportionately responsible for police shootings.
  • After a surge of solidarity, support for Black Lives Matter has sagged as the founders of the organization—not synonymous with the wider movement—have been drawn into numerous scandals involving their book-keeping and use of donations. 
  • Progressive prosecutors, buoyed to victory by the forces driving the protests, have faced fierce reprisal and even recall elections.

Meanwhile, many reforms floated in the wake of the protests have been tabled. 

  • According to the Washington Post’s police violence tracker, 2021 was the deadliest year on record for fatal police shootings.
  • A ProPublica investigation found that police departments have disclosed only 10 instances where officers who used force on protesters were disciplined. Disciplinary measures included a “written reprimand” and “two days without pay.” 
  • Members of the Minneapolis City Council who pledged to “dismantle” the city’s police department, walked back their promises, saying they meant the words” in spirit” but not in letter. The mayor, Jacob Frey, repeatedly lied about ending no-knock warrants.
  • Today, Joe Biden is expected to unveil an executive order meant to combat excessive brutality, but it’ll be tough to square those reforms with the billions of dollars he allocated to expand law enforcement departments over the next decade.

In one of her worst and most offensive gaffes, Nancy Pelosi thanked Floyd for “sacrificing” himself for the cause of “justice.” Floyd, of course, did not see himself as a martyr. He spent his last moments begging for his life. But implicit in the Democratic leader’s remark was an assumption that his senseless murder would surely lead to some kind of reform. 

Two years on, that reform is clear. It’s so popular that politicians of both parties have united around it, even at a time of historic polarization: Funding the police

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate