Where Do We Go From Here? is a series of stories that explore the future of abortion. It is a collaboration between Mother Jones and Rewire News Group. You can read the rest of the package here


After a horrifying court term that saw reproductive health rights obliterated at the same time we got guns gone wild, there’s no reason to pull punches: The Supreme Court needs to change. Democracy itself in the United States has to change, to be shored up against conservatives’ unrelenting assault.

The simplest and most effective solution is to pack (expand) the Supreme Court. Eleven members would be great—13 would be even better. But let’s not sleep on going big, and let’s demand an additional six justices. This isn’t arbitrary. The International Court of Justice, which is the judicial arm of the United Nations, has 15. That’s also true for the Court of Justice of the European Union. There’s no sacred reason the Supreme Court should be limited to nine members; arguably, more big brains could get us closer to justice. 

The only reason conservatives provide against packing the Court is to assert it is a power grab by Democrats. Honestly? So be it. Conservatives made a procedural mockery of obtaining seats on the Court. Sen. Mitch McConnell didn’t just block a hearing for Merrick Garland. He bragged about it being his “single biggest decision” as Senate majority leader in 2016. Neil Gorsuch happily took that stolen seat. Brett Kavanaugh screamed his way through his confirmation hearings, blithely batting aside credible sexual harassment claims and declaring the Clintons were out to get him. Amy Coney Barrett let herself be rushed through the confirmation process, knowing full well that doing so flew in the face of McConnell’s ostensible rationale for blocking Garland—that it was too close to the election. 

Democrats couldn’t stop those things because they didn’t have the numbers. At this moment—and perhaps only for a few more months—they do. Kill the filibuster, pack the Court. 

If we don’t, it’s just 6-3 decisions for the rest of our lives, watching justice get crushed. It’s not just reproductive health. It’s not that guns will be even more rampant than they already are. It’s a Court making it much harder for immigrants to obtain systemic relief through the justice system by ruling they can’t bring class actions. It’s a Court making a mockery of their own jurisprudence by overturning their own ruling that saved a man from death only to consign him to death two years later after the composition of the Court became more bloodthirsty. In short, it’s a Court that is gleefully engaging in an inexorable grinding down of the most vulnerable, and it has to be stopped.

Packing the Supreme Court isn’t enough, though. Trump appointed 30 percent of the judges on the federal courts of appeal and 27 percent of the district court judges. These are people like Justin Walker, who now sits on the D.C. Circuit, but just four short years ago made a full-time job of going on television to defend Kavanaugh. There’s Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge James Ho, who is making a career out of basically being a Twitter troll in a robe. Trump crammed so many judges into those federal courts of appeal that he fully flipped three of them—the 11th, the Second, and the Third—from Democratic-appointed majorities to GOP ones. 

Expanding the lower courts doesn’t just make strategic sense—it’s necessary for the swift and fair administration of justice. The Supreme Court takes roughly 2 percent of the applications that come before it because it can literally do whatever it wants. 

The federal district courts and the federal courts of appeal, however, are courts of right: They have to take every case that comes up. Sure, there are procedural ways to streamline things, but in the end, they can’t pick and choose. This means those courts have far too many cases. 

The federal district courts are so out of balance that as of the end of 2021, over 700,000 cases were pending in those district courts. That’s spread across only 667 judges. Of course, the federal courts of appeal saw over 46,000 cases filed in 2021, but Congress has only authorized 179 judges for those cases. More judges in those levels of the federal judiciary doesn’t just blunt the effects of Trump judges—it ensures more cases get heard and resolved more quickly. That’s an inherent good, but conservatives are going to howl about it nonetheless.

This brings me to the other critical aspect of shoring up democracy in this country: breaking the stranglehold conservatives have on the legislative branch even as we break their stranglehold on the judiciary. Chief Justice John Roberts gutted the Voting Rights Act in 2013 and, in 2019, threw up his hands and declared that it was just too hard to solve partisan gerrymandering. The federal courts are not going to fix voting. Only Congress can reinvigorate voting rights. Kill the filibuster, pass an outrageously comprehensive voting rights act, and break this terrible tyranny of the minority.

Legislation isn’t the solution to protecting abortion rights, at least not with the Congress we currently have. But the Biden administration isn’t entirely powerless here. Over 20 senators gave the administration a roadmap a month ago:

  • First, increase access to medication abortion and information about medication abortion. 
  • Next, fund travel and ancillary support for people who have to leave their state to get abortion care. 
  • Then, create a reproductive health ombudsman in the Department of Health and Human Services. 
  • Fourth, enforce “free choice of provider” agreements so that Medicaid beneficiaries can seek family planning services from the providers they wish. 
  • Additionally, figure out how to ensure the safety and security of private personal health data, such as that used by period tracker apps. 
  • Finally—and this is the big one: Use federal property for abortion services, particularly in the states that ban abortion. 

These are all actions that can happen without congressional approval, and while legislating via executive action is suboptimal, it’s what we’ve got to work with. It’s time for the administration to step up and make clear its commitment to reproductive health—leveraging both its executive power and the bully pulpit to advocate for Court reform.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate