Complaining About Air Travel Is a No-Brainer for Democrats

Just something to think about, while you’re stuck on the tarmac this weekend.

Tony Williams/CQ Roll Call/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Wednesday Pennsylvania’s Democratic Lt. Gov. John Fetterman proposed an intriguing new policy idea: What if airlines weren’t so terrible?

With non-weather-induced cancellations throwing a big wrench into the summer-vacation season, and the Fourth of July holiday travel estimated to bring even more chaos, Fetterman, who is facing Republican television doctor Mehmet Oz in one of the 2022 midterms’ closest Senate races, asked President Joe Biden to do something about it. The Department of Transportation “should start fining airlines up to $27,500 per passenger for every flight they cancel that they knew they didn’t have the staff to fly.”

As Fetterman noted, there was precedent for levying financial penalties against airlines that mistreat and mislead their customers. In the first six months of 2009, airlines had kept passengers on the tarmac for longer than three hours 613 times. In Rochester, Minnesota, for instance, “Passengers were kept for about six hours waiting inside the cramped plane amid wailing babies and a smelly toilet even though they were only 50 yards from a terminal,” the Associated Press reported. In another instance, Air Canada passengers waited for 12 hours.

Being locked in a claustrophobic toilet chamber with nary an Au Bon Pain in sight is a sort of funny curse to imagine inflicting on your worst enemies, but it’s a pretty miserable thing to subject paying customers to. Which is why that summer, the Obama administration imposed a $27,5000 per-passenger fee on airlines that left passengers stranded on the tarmac for more than three hours, without giving them an opportunity to, as the industry is so fond of saying, “deplane.” The rule worked, and such delays soon plummeted. 

Fetterman isn’t the only politician calling on the feds to reign in predatory airlines. On Tuesday, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) similarly called on DOT to impose $27,500 fines on airlines that impose lengthy, non-weather-related delays—and fines of $55,000-per-passenger “if they cancel flights that they know cannot be fully staffed.”

As Sanders noted in a letter to Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg: 

While the price of airline tickets have skyrocketed by 38 percent over the last year, airline delays have increased by 50 percent and cancellations are up by 18 percent compared to where they were before the pandemic. So far this year, one out of every five flights in the United States were delayed, while airlines are cancelling flights four times as often on high-travel weekends than they did in 2019.

And that was after the industry received a hefty federal bailout. Other Democrats, including Rep. Jamaal Bowman of New York, joined the chorus:

As The American Prospect‘s Robert Kuttner has argued, taking on huge corporations that got bailed out with taxpayer money and then treat paying customers poorly is sort of a political no-brainer. People with the means to pay for premium travel tiers and upgrades might not have much of a gripe with air travel, but for normal people, it can just be a cascading series of slights and inconveniences—and that’s when things go well.

Buttigieg, for his part, has acknowledged the airlines’ increasingly unreliability and met with industry representatives about his concerns, but according to the Los Angeles Times, he “wants to see whether there are major flight disruptions over the Fourth of July holiday weekend and the rest of the summer” before taking any enforcement actions. It’s not surprising to see a candidate like Fetterman or a senator like Sanders latch onto air travel’s summer from hell. What’s more surprising is that—for now, anyway—a cabinet secretary who still aspires to be something isn’t barking just as loudly.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate