August 2, 2022

A “Poster Child” for Election Deniers Could Run Elections in Arizona

Mark Finchem is part of a wave of election deniers running as the “America First Secretary of State Coalition.”

Republican State Rep. Mark FinchemMother Jones illustration; Ross D. Franklin/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Update, August 3: Republican State Rep. Mark Finchem won his bid to be the Republican nominee for Secretary of State in Arizona.

Arizona could be gearing up to elect a 2020 election denier to the position responsible for overseeing future elections.

Republican State Rep. Mark Finchem is a huge proponent of the lie that former President Trump won the 2020 election. Politico called him a “poster child” for this lost cause. He supported the slapdash GOP review of all the votes cast in Arizona’s Maricopa County in 2020, and he called for decertifying the results in that state. He’s backed by Trump, Michael Flynn, and the MyPillow guy, Mike Lindell. And he appears close to winning the Republican nomination for Arizona secretary of state.

Polling for the race is scarce, but a recent survey of 502 likely Republican voters showed 32 percent supporting Finchem—a significant lead over competitor Beau Lane, who came in at 11 percent. To give you an idea of the stakes in the general election: During the last secretary of state election in 2018, when Democrats had more of an edge nationwide than is expected this year, Democrat Katie Hobbs won the Arizona secretary of state race by a margin of just 0.8 percent.

And Finchem isn’t the only election denier vying to run elections. Across the country, a group of election deniers who call themselves the “America First Secretary of State Coalition” are aiming to control elections in battleground states. Several members of the coalition, including Tina Peters in Colorado, have lost their primaries. Others, like Michigan’s Kristina Karamo and New Mexico’s Audrey Trujillo, have secured the GOP nominations in their states. Tonight, Kansas Republicans will decide whether to nominate election denier Mike Brown for secretary of state, or stick with incumbent Scott Schwab. And if all goes well for Finchem, he could come one step closer to imperiling election integrity for years to come.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate