An Arizona Judge Just Reinstated a 150-Year-Old Total Abortion Ban

Under the law, which has no exceptions for rape or incest, abortion providers can serve prison time.

Pro-choice supporters demonstrate at the Federal Courthouse in Tucson, AZ after the Supreme Court overturned Roe vs Wade in June 2022.Christopher Brown/ZUMA Press Wire/ZUMA Press Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Before Arizona was even a state, its first territorial legislature enacted a total ban on abortion in 1864.

On Friday, a state judge lifted a decades-old injunction blocking that law. Now, any person who helps “procure the miscarriage” for a pregnant person, “unless it is necessary to save her life” risks spending two to five years in prison.

In her ruling, released a day before a 2022 law banning abortion after 15 weeks was slated to take effect, Judge Kellie Johnson of Pima County Superior Court reasoned that the 1973 injunction that quashed the Civil War-era abortion ban relied on the US Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision. That case, which guaranteed the right to abortion until fetal viability, was overturned by the country’s high court in June—leaving the question of abortion access in the hands of individual states, including more than half a dozen with pre-Roe bans on the books, including in Arizona, Michigan, and Wisconsin. 

“The court finds that because the legal basis for the judgment entered in 1973 now has been overruled, it must vacate the judgment entirely,” Johnson wrote.

Abortion initially remained legal in Arizona after the Supreme Court’s decision invalidated Roe. But questions about whether the 1864 ban—which was updated and ratified in 1901—sent a chilling effect through the state’s nine abortion clinics, causing some to stop providing abortion care due to fear of prosecution.

Even the state’s top Republicans were split on whether the 158-year-old ban was valid: This summer, Arizona Governor Doug Ducey said that the 15-week ban he signed in March would supplant the older ban, while his fellow-Republican, Attorney General Mark Brnovich, argued the pre-statehood ban was enforceable.

“Our office has concluded the Legislature has made its intentions clear with regards to abortion laws,” Brnovich wrote on Twitter. The 1864 law, he wrote, “is back in effect and will not be repealed,” thus superseding the 15-week ban that was set to take effect later this month.

Both the 1864 total ban and the 15-week ban passed nearly two centuries later provide exceptions only for situations in which the parent’s life is at risk; neither law has carve-outs for rape or incest.

But even after Friday’s court decision, it is still not fully clear what the law is in Arizona. In response to questions about Johnson’s ruling, Gov. Ducey’s office told ABC News that he was “proud to sign” the 15-week abortion ban, “which goes into effect [Saturday].”

In this case, though, Ducey’s statement may prove to be hollow. As the state’s Attorney General, Brnovich is the one with final say on whether to prosecute people in violation of the state’s laws—including the 1864 one, if he so chooses. He has indicated he will enforce the stricter ban. “We applaud the court for upholding the will of the legislature and providing clarity and uniformity on this important issue,” he tweeted Friday. “I have and will continue to protect the most vulnerable Arizonans.”

If that’s the route Brnovich takes, it may be short-lived: Both he and Ducey are term-limited in their respective roles as Attorney General and Governor, so neither can run for reelection. Both races to replace them in November are tight.

The next state Attorney General will either be Republican Abe Hamadeh, who says he will work to make sure Arizona’s abortion laws are “fully implemented,” or Democrat Kris Mayes, who says she would not imprison healthcare providers for breaking Arizona’s abortion laws. The University of Virginia’s Center for Politics rates their match-up as “competitive.”

The race for the Governor is also a toss-up between two candidates with very different views on abortion rights. Democrat Katie Hobbs, who is currently Arizona’s Secretary of State, called Friday’s ruling “draconian” and said that, if elected Governor, she will do everything in her power “to stop oppressive bans created before women even had the right to vote to control our reproductive freedom.”

According to polling averaged by FiveThirtyEight, Hobbs is currently ahead of GOP gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake, who calls abortion “the ultimate sin,” by just two points. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate