Queen Elizabeth, Britain’s Longest-Serving Monarch, Has Died

She lived to swear in her 15th Prime Minister just this week.

Queen Elizabeth II Stefan Wermuth/WPA/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Queen Elizabeth II, the world’s longest reigning monarch in over three centuries, who lived to swear in her 15th Prime Minister just this week, has died aged 96. 

Elizabeth’s seven-decade reign, recently fêted during her Platinum Jubilee, began and ended during times of crisis across the British Isles. Upon ascension in 1952, aged 25, the British Empire was reeling from the world war and continuing its descent into twilight, across a map redrawn by new alliances and emerging powers. Meanwhile, post-war Britain was an economically and emotionally exhausted bomb-site, with the monumental task of reconstruction ahead. Recently, the fiasco of Brexit with its accompanying economic and social strife has imperiled Britain’s leadership in the community of nations it once helped to restore.

The sheer amount of history she viewed from the throne was staggering: Wars, violent territorial crises, hand-overs, more disastrous wars, and the petty (and not so petty), tribulations of Westminster. These twists and turns were matched by the unparalleled place she occupied, for better and worse, in the global imagination. The domestic dramas of her exceptionally dysfunctional family—by turns operatic, outrageous, sad, or downright creepy—sold tabloids, inspired an internationally popular mini-series among an inordinate number of franchises, and kept the entire Windsor enterprise afloat and center stage in British life.

Through it all, the Queen’s signal brand, as marketed by the palace and the Royal machine, was dignified grit, at a royal remove. Dry and dutiful, accompanied by her loyal (and gaffe-prone) consort Prince Philip and beloved corgis, she kept the whole thing together, they say, a singular figure across most of the past century, showing up, day in day out, to perform the functions of a ceremonial monarchy.

Now, Prince Charles, her 73-year-old eldest son and heir, will be king, and the remaining nations of the Commonwealth will no doubt have a new opportunity to reevaluate their lingering and costly relationship to a distant king, sitting on a throne on a distant island that feels more globally and culturally isolated than at any time in recent memory.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate