Did Brian Kemp Deploy a Dog Whistle During His Debate Against Stacey Abrams?

Plus other takeaways from their matchup.

Incumbent Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp debates Democratic challenger Stacey Abrams on Oct. 17, 2022 in Atlanta, Georgia. Ben Gray/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Monday was a busy day in Georgia politics.

In the morning, Georgians could begin early voting.

In the evening, Georgia could see their options for governorā€”Republican incumbent Brian Kemp and Democratic challenger Stacey Abramsā€”participate in their first televised debate since they both ran for the Georgia governorā€™s mansion in the contentious 2018 gubernatorial election.

The rematch race has been heralded as one of the nation’s most important gubernatorial contests, but it’s generally tough to oust an incumbent who lowered taxes, like Kemp has. According to polls averaged by FiveThirtyEight, Kemp is ahead of Abrams by more than five points.

But during the hour-long match-up, Abrams argued that Kemp hurt Georgians in other ways, such as by opting against accepting federal funding to expand Medicaid and by supporting laws that reduced voter access and reproductive freedom. ā€œThe most dangerous thing facing Georgians,ā€ she said, ā€œis four more years of Brian Kemp.ā€

In turn, Kemp said he delivered for Georgia by keeping businesses and schools open during the pandemic and building up a budget surplus of more than $6 billion. ā€œIf Stacey Abrams had been your governor over the last four years, you would not have that revenue,ā€ Kemp said. ā€œShe wanted to stay locked down.ā€

Libertarian candidate Shane Hazel unintentionally made the case that third-party candidates polling in the low single digits probably shouldnā€™t be invited to participate in such debates in the first place, as Atlanta Journal-Constitution reporter Tia Mitchell smartly noted. For starters, he falsely claimed that COVID-19 vaccines killed a bunch of people.

Here are five key takeaways from the debate: 

Was that a dog-whistle?

Outside of Hazel repeatedly talking over Kemp and Abrams and referring to Abrams by her first name (eventually the moderators shut off his microphone), the debate was fairly civil. Neither Kemp nor Abrams ever raised their voicesā€”which is why it surprised me when Kemp, in a back-and-forth over how many members of law enforcement support each of their respective campaigns, said, ā€œI know Ms. Abrams is upset and mad.”

I canā€™t discern his intent with the statement, and neither campaign immediately responded to my questions about it, but the words addressed to a very even-keeled Abrams evoked the racist trope of the ā€œAngry Black Womanā€ for some viewers. And by the wide-eyed look on Abramsā€™ face after Kemp said it, it didnā€™t appear to sit right with her either.

How the candidates would address gun violence

Kemp said that much of the stateā€™s gun-related crime had to do with gangs recruiting high-school aged children. He said his new public safety plan is ā€œstiffening penalties for gang members that are recruiting our children.ā€

Abrams pointed out that street gangs were not behind the murder of Asian women at an Atlanta spa in 2021, or the cause behind most school shootings. ā€œStreet gangs are one part of the problem, but we have a governor who has weakened gun laws across the state,ā€ Abrams said,  referencing a measure Kemp signed that allows gun owners to carry concealed handguns in public without first obtaining a license from the state.

ā€œI believe that we can protect the second amendment and second graders at the exact same time,ā€ Abrams added.

What the candidates have to say about Georgia’s new voting laws

In 2018, Abrams lost to Kemp by fewer than 60,000 votes. She never fully conceded because she felt her loss was caused by widespread voter disenfranchisement. On Monday, she said voters were again facing unfair barriers to voting on the first day of early voting under Georgiaā€™s new election laws, which limit access to voter drop boxes, among other things. “Just today a homeless woman was denied the right to vote in Forsyth County,ā€ Abrams said, ā€œbecause she could not receive a provisional ballot because she had been challenged.”

Kemp pointed out that under Georgiaā€™s new voting laws, the state ā€œhad record turnout in the Republican primary and the Democratic primary. He added: ā€œIt’s easy to vote and hard to cheat.ā€

What would you do with $6.6 billion?

Georgia has amassed a budget surplus of roughly $6.6 billion since Kemp has been governor.

Abrams, who argues much of that money came from a Democrat-led US Congress, wants to use that money to increase the number of pre-K spots for children and provide teachers with $11,000 raises, noting a 67 percent retention rate in the profession.

Kemp, who says the money was accumulated through less stringent pandemic shut-down policies, supports using the surplus funds for income tax refunds and property tax relief grants.

Opposite viewpoints on Medicaid expansion

Abrams was keen to mention that Georgia is one of 12 states that have not accepted federal funding to expand Medicaid, which leaves more than 200,000 Georgians without medical insurance and causes financial strain on hospitals that treat many uninsured patients. ā€œYou have 19 hospitals at risk of closure joining the six hospitals that closed under this government,ā€ said Abrams. ā€œWe are sending a Brinks truck of $3.5 billion of our money to Kentucky, to Louisiana, [and] to Ohio because this governor will not accept the money and the resources that we need in our state.ā€

Kemp noted that an additional 600,000 people have become insured through Medicaid since he has become governor, but claimed that Medicaid in general is a ā€œbroken government program.ā€

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate