Glenn Youngkin Is Only as Moderate as the Election Denier He’s Campaigning For

The Virginia governor was just in Arizona giving a boost to notorious Big Lie promoter Kari Lake.

Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin speaks at a rally with Oregon gubernatorial candidate Christine Drazan in Aurora, Oregon. Mathieu Lewis-Rolland/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Is Glenn Youngkin running for president? Paul Ryan thinks he should. A voter in Tucson told him to. The Republican governor of Virginia smiled, perhaps a little too eagerly, when an ABC News reporter asked Youngkin again on Wednesday evening after firing up a crowd of conservative voters in Scottsdale, Arizona. “I haven’t really thought about 2024; we’re focused on 2022,” he said. He was in Arizona, he continued, because “every state deserves a Republican governor.”

But the presence of the candidate seated a few feet away from him, in a small airplane hangar at the offices of a company that makes parts for firearms, answered the question more frankly than Youngkin is prepared to right now. Of course he’s keeping his options open; why else would somebody interrupt their busy schedule to do six events in one day with Kari Lake?

Youngkin, the former president and COO of the private-equity behemoth the Carlyle Group, was elected in an upset last year by riding a wave of opposition to pandemic restrictions and a racist panic about Critical Race Theory, while keeping Donald Trump himself at arm’s length. Trump endorsed Youngkin, but Youngkin never appeared with Trump. It was a flimsy sort of two-step, but for plenty of Republicans it was enough. Youngkin was a moderate, not in an actual policy sense, but in a purely aesthetic one; he represented a return to the party’s bread-and-butter—a tall, rich white man whose signature accessory was not a red hat but a red vest.

Lake, the Republican nominee for governor of Arizona, is not trying to fool anyone into thinking she is a retro Republican; she is running instead as the next evolution of the performance-based politics of the Trump era. A former local TV news anchor at Phoenix’s Fox affiliate, she questioned Fox News’ decision to call the state for Joe Biden on air, quit her job not long after, and became one of Arizona’s most fervent proponents of Trump’s false narrative of a stolen election. She has said that “you have to be smoking Hunter Biden’s crack pipe” to believe that Joe Biden won Arizona. She has called on the state to decertify the 2020 election. She has vowed to “get to the bottom” of what really happened in the “corrupt” election before she does anything else in office, although she also says that she her first priority will be to declare an “invasion” on the southern border. According to the most recent polls, which gives her a narrow lead over Democratic secretary of state Katie Hobbs—whom Lake believes should be in prison—she just might get that chance.

Flying across the country to campaign with one of America’s most fervent election deniers is a choice, and it was meant to be seen as one. Youngkin was very deliberately asserting that the Republican Party must come together as it is, not by cleaving off its most anti-democratic elements but by elevating them to even greater power, so that the anti-democratic elements can use their new authority in ways that are beneficial to Republicans. This is not a new direction so much as an acceptance of the current one.

At the evening rally in Scottsdale, Youngkin—who has begrudgingly said that he would have voted to certify the election and also begrudgingly said that Joe Biden is the legitimate president—did not discuss the 2020 election that had helped inspire his endorsee to get into politics, and Lake did him the kindness of largely avoiding the subject in her own remarks. They focused, instead, on the general-election politics that binds them—a demand for more (and more militant) resources at the southern border; an end to “woke” education; and a freedom from CDC tyranny. But you didn’t have to look far to find a reminder of the small-d democratic stakes of the election, and the forces that had powered Lake’s rise—as they shook hands with voters afterwards, Mark Finchem, the election-denying candidate for secretary of state, lurked just a few feet away, in his characteristic white cowboy hat.

In the scrum with reporters afterwards, Youngkin tried to elide his disagreement with Lake and Finchem over whether the current president is an imposter. Governors, he said, “have to go to work in order to provide much more confidence in the election process,” he said, before comparing Democratic complaints about the Florida recount and Russian election interference to Trump’s invented conspiracy. “It’s not just Republicans. It’s Democrats. I ran against someone who said the election was stolen in 2000. And in 2016 they said that Donald Trump wasn’t legitimately elected. So this is not a Republican problem, it’s an American challenge. And our job as governors is to invest in the process.” 

“This is what I’ve gone to work to do,” he said. “And I can guarantee you that Kari’s going to go to work as well.”

That’s certainly one way of describing what Lake wants to do. But it was a neat rhetorical trick on Youngkin’s part, to turn support for a lie that led to a violent attack on the Capitol into just another opportunity for governors to roll up their sleeves.

In Arizona, Youngkin was eager to show conservative voters that he is, above all, a loyal party man, by demonstrating as explicitly as he could that there’s a place for the most fervently conspiratorial election deniers in the highest ranks of the party. But if the party isn’t moderate, the Party Man isn’t going to be either.

Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, the former House Republican conference chairwoman who praised Youngkin after his election last fall, criticized him for the “accomodation” he was granting to the party’s most anti-democratic actors. 

“Republicans don’t agree on everything,” he said Wednesday, when asked about Cheney’s comments. “But I’m telling you, we agree on so much.” 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate