Arizona GOP Candidate Mark Finchem Nurtures Ties to Extremists Engaged in Voter Intimidation

And he’s vying for a job overseeing the state’s elections.

Mark Finchem at former President Donald Trump's Save America rally at the Canyon Moon Ranch in Florence, Arizona.Christopher Brown/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

If Mark Finchem, the Republican candidate for secretary of state in Arizona and a QAnon-friendly election denialist who was recently accused of antisemitism and who days ago attended a conference with conspiracy theorist extremists, wins on Tuesday, he will soon oversee all the state’s elections, including the upcoming 2024 presidential contest. That possibility has long had Democrats and democracy activists worried. And in the weeks before Election Day, Finchem’s ties to far-right fanatics who have engaged in armed acts of voter intimidation have provided even more reason for concern. 

In Arizona, as early voting has been underway, several right-wing groups have tried to deploy volunteers—sometimes armed—to monitor ballot drop boxes. This effort has included taking photos or videos of voters and posting online information about them. One group called Clean Elections USA, which is led by Melody Jennings, a supporter of the QAnon conspiracy theory, has staked out drop boxes in Maricopa County to watch for so-called “mules”—people who illegally dump multiple ballots at these collection sites. The “mules” conspiracy theory has been championed by conservative activist and one-time felon Dinesh D’Souza in his widely and fully debunked 2000 Mules pseudo-documentary. (The truth: Mules don’t  exist.) And in Yavapai County, a group associated with the Oath Keepers militia and another outfit called Lions of Liberty mountedOperation Dropbox” to monitor all the collection boxes in that county and have their “patriots” report alleged incidents of “ballot box stuffing” to the county sheriff. 

The League of Women Voters late last month sued Clean Elections USA, the Oath Keepers-related organization, and Lions of Liberty, claiming these mules-hunting activities amounted to “voter intimidation” and sought an injunction to halt their dropbox surveillance programs. The Yavapai County groups agreed to suspend their operations and were dismissed from the case. Days ago, US District Court Judge Michael Liburdi, who had been appointed by former President Donald Trump, issued a temporary order curtailing Clean Elections USA’s actions, and the group agreed to refrain from confronting voters within 75 feet of the drop boxes and from openly carrying weapons within 250 feet. “It is paramount that we balance the rights of the defendant to engage in their constitutionally protected First Amendment activity with the interest in the plaintiffs and in voters casting a vote free of harassment and intimidation,” Liburdi said.

Finchem, long a member of this paranoid milieu of militia-related dropbox-watchers, has championed their efforts. In mid-October, he tweeted, “WATCH ALL DROP BOXES. PERIOD. SAVE THE REPUBLIC.”

And after the vigilante monitors began showing up bearing weapons at drop boxes, Finchem defended them, saying “We’re an open carry state, people can watch those boxes.” Even if they happen to be volunteers wearing military-style armor and brandishing assault weapons. 

These are his people. A former public safety officer in Michigan who left his job with a poor performance evaluation, Finchem has claimed to be an Oath Keeper himself, and for his secretary of state campaign, he has raised nearly $10,000 from donors linked to that far-right extremist organization.

Finchem, who was on the Capitol steps during the January 6 riot, is part of this network of election denialists and militia extremists promoting falsehoods about elections. In August, he attended an event organized by True the Vote, a rightwing group that promotes debunked election conspiracies (and helped D’Souza produce 2000 Mules), and two conservative sheriffs associations that challenge the authority of the federal government—Protect America Now and the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA). At this gathering, election monitors were actively recruited. The so-called “constitutional sheriff” movement led by CSPOA claims that the ultimate law enforcement authority in the United States resides with sheriffs who can overrule federal and state authorities. As the Southern Poverty Law Center notes, “This idea was pioneered by Christian identity minister William Potter Gale in the 1970s and described as Posse Comitatus.”

Finchem is a fan.  

Last year, he welcomed the endorsement of Richard Mack, an Oath Keeper and founder of the CSPOA. Mack has long associated with white nationalists, anti-government extremists, and conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones. During the infamous 2014 stand-off at the Bundy ranch in Nevada, Mack served as an adviser to the Bundy clan and told a reporter he and his comrades were “actually strategizing to put all the women up at the front. If they’re gonna start shooting, it’s going to be women that are gonna be televised all across the world getting shot by these rogue federal officers.”

At a conference last year, Finchem suggested that members of the Three Percenters, an antigovernment, militia-oriented movement, join Mack’s CSPOA. At this event he also dismissed criticism of the January 6 rioters, saying, “They’re terrified of you. They, the Marxists, who have basically attempted a coup of the people. They are terrified of you. Why? Because you are not sitting down and shutting up.”

Finchem has also been a champion of True the Vote. When Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich last month said the FBI and the IRS should investigate True the Vote for alleged fraud related to the claims presented in 2000 Mules, Finchem, who hosted a public screening of the film, denounced him.

Far-right sheriffs, fraud-promoting election-denying groups, militia-like outfits that intimidate voters—these are Finchem’s allies. He shares their paranoid and unfounded notions. His connections to such fanatics signal how he will manage elections in the crucial swing state of Arizona should he defeat Democrat Adrian Fontes on Tuesday and become its secretary of state. Finchem can be expected to skew the system according to their fever dreams and extremist views. When it comes to how he will handle voting in Arizona, he certainly can be judged by the company he keeps. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate