Minority Rule Is Coming for Progressive Prosecutors

Across the country, politicians are promising to subvert the power of local prosecutors.

Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm. If the Republican candidate wins the election for Attorney General, he's threatened to take Chisholm's prosecutorial power away. Ivan Moreno/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On a cloudy day in September, Eric Toney, the Republican candidate for Wisconsin Attorney General, called a press conference. Flanked by local police brass, Toney was in Milwaukee—a city he said is descending into a “shooting gallery”—to announce a signature campaign policy: Taking power away from the local district attorney John Chisholm. 

“I refuse to accept this as the new normal,” Toney said of a 91 percent rise of Milwaukee’s murder rate since 2019. “That’s why I have advocated for granting our attorney general original prosecution authority here in Milwaukee so we can take on the crime that they are unable, or unwilling to prosecute.”

Across the country, Republican state lawmakers are calling for the same, taking away the power of local prosecutors who have adopted reforms that seek to reduce mass incarceration. But these power grabs are about more than crime. They are about the implementation of minority rule. State politicians are removing home rule from local voters in hopes of gaining points for crushing cities they depict as lawless and ungovernable.

“[Toney is] carelessly—and for motivated political gain—using racially coded rhetoric to invite the open usurpation of the legal order set forward by the state itself and the state constitution,” said Atiba Ellis, a law professor and voting rights expert at Marquette University in Milwaukee. “And that’s a dangerous game.”

Toney’s proposal is that if he’s elected in November, he, not Chisholm, would make the charging decisions for Milwaukee county, where about 70 percent of Wisconsin’s Black population lives. Chisholm, first elected in 2007, had gained national attention as a reformer who sought to implement a “paradigm shift” in how district attorney’s operate, paving the way for other progressive prosecutors in cities like Boston, Chicago, St. Louis, Philadelphia, and San Francisco.

Chisholm would not be the first DA to face this anti-democratic gambit. In St. Louis county, after Wesley Bell was elected on a progressive platform in 2018, the Missouri state legislature drafted a bill that would refer criminal complaints to the Missouri Attorney General to review if Bell’s office chose not to charge them. Earlier this year in Florida, Governor Ron DeSantis suspended the state attorney for Hillsborough county, Andrew Warren, after he said he’d defy the 15-week abortion ban that DeSantis championed.

As Republicans demagogue crime in the weeks leading up to the 2022 midterm elections, state lawmakers in Pennsylvania have filed articles of impeachment against Philadelphia’s progressive prosecutor Larry Krasner, who’d been soundly reelected in 2021. The Republican candidate for Minnesota Attorney General, Jim Schultz, has threatened to follow Toney’s example if progressive candidate Mary Moriarty takes control of the Hennepin County Attorney’s office in Minneapolis.

Since the 2020 election, Republican leaders in Wisconsin like Robin Vos have publicly expressed their preference to exclude Milwaukee from state elections. With Eric Toney’s original jurisdiction plan, they’ll do one better: disempowering Milwaukee voters in their own local elections.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate