Trump’s Primary Winners Were a Bunch of Election Night Losers

Once again, the former president’s inability to judge competence and character has backfired.

Drew Angerer/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The full impact of Tuesday’s midterm elections won’t be clear for days, if not weeks. But the results in the East and Midwest were nowhere near as bad for Democrats as they could have been, in part because of a familiar dynamic: Donald Trump is a really bad judge of competence and character. During this year’s Republican primaries, Trump sought to demonstrate his dominance over the party and influence over the electorate by backing a cast of individuals who could have played The Guy Who Hijacks a Submarine in a 1990s thriller. In the general election, it didn’t go great.

Nowhere was Trumpā€™s influence more pronounced than Pennsylvania, which he claimed had been stolen from him in 2020, and where his legal team and supporters went to great lengths to disenfranchise the state. In the race for governor, he threw his weight in the primary behind Doug Mastriano, a hard-right state senator who was outside the Capitol on January 6, backed the idea that state legislatures can overturn the popular vote in their states, and talked frequently about using the power of his office to appoint a secretary of state who shared his views. Mastriano had also called for women who obtain abortions to face murder charges. Mastriano lost the general election, and it wasnā€™t even particularly close.

The daytime television star Dr. Oz, whom Trump carried across the finish line in an expensive and competitive primaryā€”Trumpā€™s reasons for backing a TV doctor probably donā€™t need a ton of parsingā€”came closer in his race against Democrat John Fetterman. But Oz, to the surprise of perhaps Trump and no one else, turned out to be a terrible candidate, who did not appear to really have much of a connection to the commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 

Thereā€™s a world in which Oz might have simply used his celebrity status to run a normal campaign, but he ran an extremely Trumpian one instead. Ozā€™s campaign attempted to turn Fettermanā€™s recent health crisis into not just a question of strength and stamina, but of moralityā€”he didnā€™t just have a stroke, he deserved one. ā€œā€‹ā€‹If John Fetterman had ever eaten a vegetable in his life, then maybe he wouldn’t have had a major stroke,ā€ Oz’s spokesperson said in September. Itā€™s the kind of unfathomably mean and unnecessary statement that would have made Trump proud, but itā€™s not hard to see how such a message lost.

In New Hampshire, a state with a popular Republican governor, and where Democratic Sen. Maggie Hassan won by the narrowest of margins in 2016, Trumpā€™s political instincts cost Republicans a shot at another pickup opportunity. He backed Don Bolducā€”a retired Army general who claimed that schools were leaving out litter boxes for kids who identified as animals, said that the above-mentioned popular Republican governor was a ā€œcommunist Chinese sympathizer,ā€ and insisted that the 2020 election was stolen (until immediately after the primary, when he announced that heā€™d changed his mind). Bolduc, unsurprisingly, lost, even as Gov. Chris Sununu easily won another term.

In Michiganā€”another state where Trumpā€™s lies about the 2020 election gripped the partyā€”another conservative TV personality Trump backed in a primary, Tudor Dixon, lost handily to incumbent Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. In Georgia, Trumpā€™s preferred candidate, the memoirist and retired football star Herschel Walker, is heading to a runoff against incumbent Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock. Meanwhile, the Republican governor Trump disparaged for not helping him to steal Georgia’s 2020 election, Brian Kemp, won easily.

Trump wasnā€™t completely shut out. JD Vance, whom he carried to victory in the Ohio Republican Senate primary, defeated Democratic Rep. Tim Ryanā€”albeit in a race that wasnā€™t expected to be as close or as expensive as it ultimately proved to be. Another MAGA Republican, Rep. Ted Budd, was elected to the Senate from North Carolina. And thereā€™s still a reasonable chance that former local TV news anchor Kari Lakeā€”who has called for the results of the 2020 election in her state to be decertifiedā€”could be elected governor of Arizona. As I wrote in a profile of Lake before the election, a victory by her would be a major event in American politics, and it would cement Trumpā€™s legacy in the future of the Republican party, in one of the nationā€™s tightest swing states.

But Republicans werenā€™t just looking for a few big wins on election night. They expected a big red wave. And, just like when he worked in the White House, Trump’s inability to surround himself with the best peopleā€”and instead gravitating toward people just like himā€”ended up costing his party big time.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate