Brazil’s Biggest Soap Opera Right Now? The George Santos Scandal.

“I’m obsessed.”

Newly elected Republican Rep. George Santos Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The spiral of lies disseminated by newly elected Republican Rep. George Santos of New York has made him a political and social pariah and object of relentless scrutiny. Since the New York Times’ December exposé revealed the newcomer essentially manufactured his resumé and biography, the 34-year-old Long Island congressman has become the gift that keeps on giving for reporters, political junkies, meme watchers, and pretty much anyone interested in a good story about grift. A brief inventory of Santos’ lies includes: him being Jewish, his grandparents having fled the Nazis, his mother supposedly dying on 9/11, his entire higher education and professional background, his ownership of several properties, and the list goes on. He has yet to be sworn in, due to the chaos in the House GOP, but the representative has become radioactive. As the 118th Congress opened this week, he could be seen isolated and diminutive in the vast chamber.

The shitstorm swirling around the Republican politician has particularly resonated with Brazilians. One fact amidst the myriad of debunked fabrications is that he is the son of two immigrants from Brazil. He is also facing a renewed investigation for a fraud committed in Niterói, a city just outside of Rio de Janeiro, in 2008, when he stole a checkbook from one of his caregiving mother’s patients to buy $1,313.63 in clothes and shoes. His whereabouts were unknown to prosecutors for years until the news of his election. Although he admitted to the crime in 2010, when he was 19 years old, Santos told the New York Post he is “not a criminal here—not here or in Brazil or any jurisdiction in the world. Absolutely not. That didn’t happen.”

Brazilians are big on soap operas and have a singular appreciation for dramatic plot twists in politics. (Consider our impeached president, disgraced judge, and formerly incarcerated president coming back from the ashes—just for starters.) So naturally, they were hooked. “Please don’t talk to me about ANY subject other than US Congressman George Santos,” one Twitter user posted. “I’m obsessed.” Another described the debacle as a hypothetical co-production between Brazil and the United States that could resemble Inventing Anna, the Netflix series about the fake heiress Anna Delvey. “Americans LOVE to fall for con artists,” yet another said in a tweet referencing Delvey. “I’m already imagining the series and its various seasons with many scenes from Carnival in Rio.” 

And my personal favorite: “I love that, thanks to George Santos, gringos are getting a taste of why House of Cards has nothing on Brazilian politicians.” 

Most reactions express a mix of embarrassment and amusement. While Santos wasn’t born in Brazil—his campaign bio says he is a “first generation American born in Queens”some Brazilians have attributed his flexible relationship to the truth to his heritage and the “Brazilian Way,” which can be interpreted as a predisposition for transgression. “He took the DNA of the homeland to America—shame,” a user posted on Instagram. “Brazil has been better at exporting talent,” a tweet said of the country’s soccer tradition. Thanks to Santos, one person suggested, “it will be easier to explain why Brazil is not for beginners.”

Analyses of a mongrel complex and not entirely deserved stereotypes that permeate even Disney cartoons aside, some chose to focus their criticism on Santos’ support of former President Jair Bolsonaro, who has been wandering around Florida while pretending Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s inauguration didn’t happen. In November, Santos posted a photo with Carla Zambelli, a far-right congresswoman and hardcore Bolsonaro supporter who chased a man down the streets while pointing a gun at him. (Some users have commented on Santos’ Instagram asking him for help to denounce the “stolen elections” in Brazil.) 

If the American electorate is interested in this type of merchandise,” a comment in a Folha de São Paulo newspaper article reads, “we have at least another three hundred ready to be shipped. Export is what matters.” 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate