How Ron DeSantis Ignited a Republican Civil War Over Ukraine

GOP presidential hopefuls are scrambling to take sides.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis answers questions from the media following his "State of the State" address in Tallahassee on March 7, 2023. CHENEY ORR/AFP via Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

As a leading contender for Republican presidential nomination next year, Ron DeSantis has the ability to force the rest of his party to quickly take sides on political fights. That’s what happened this week, after the Florida governor described the Russian invasion of Ukraine as a “territorial dispute” in which the United States does not have a “vital interest.” On one side of this GOP divide is former President Donald Trump, a Putin apologist who is pulling his supporters toward an isolationist posture. On the other side, Republicans who might prefer not to criticize Trump or DeSantis are now being forced to disagree with the two GOP frontrunners by arguing that the war is indeed important to US interests.

DeSantis’ comments may have hastened the already growing fissures in the Republican Party over Ukraine, forcing those who want to support Ukraine to take a stand. On the Sunday shows today, three more Republicans criticized DeSantis’ isolationist approach.

In his statement to Tucker Carlsonā€”who has criticized aid to Ukraine and its president, Volodymyr Zelenskyā€”DeSantis argued that checking the power of China is among the US’ top priorities while safeguarding Ukraine is not. A number of prominent Republicans clearly disagree, arguing, among other things, that an isolationist approach toward Ukraine would signal to China that the US would do little to counter Chinese aggression toward Taiwan. Chinese PresidentXi Jinping “wants to see how we respond [to the war in Ukraine], whether or not we can keep our allies together, whether or not NATO stays together or whether or not it strengthens NATO,” Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD) said on NBC’s Meet the Press. “So this is a bigger picture than just territory.”

Rounds tried not to directly confront DeSantis, but he didn’t dispute the idea that DeSantis’ statement may have been a result of primary politics. 

There’s “a clear vital national interest to support what is going on in Ukraine,ā€ New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu, a Republican, said Sunday on CNNā€™s State of the Union. Sununu, who has criticized DeSantis in the past and is considering his own run for president, argued that if the United States were to back out of the conflict, it would embolden China and Russia and send a message of weakness to US allies. 

Former Vice President Mike Pence, who is also mulling a 2024 presidential run, likewise came down on the other side from DeSantis. “The war in Ukraine is not a territorial dispute,” he told ABC’s Jon Karl in an interview that aired in part on ABC’s This Week on Sunday. “It’s a Russian invasion.”

Both Sununu and Pence argued that curtailing support for Ukraine now could land the US in the position of having to send troops to Europe to defend NATO allies in the future.

DeSantis’ comments to Carlson came ahead of three important developments in the war: the International Criminal Court issuing a warrant for Putin’s arrest on war crimes; Putin’s visit to the captured Ukrainian city of Mariupol this weekend, staking claim to the territory; and Xi’s upcoming visit to Russia. The Chinese leader’s trip, in particular, underscores the point DeSantis’ critics are making.

But DeSantis, who is courting Trump supporters as he builds toward an expected presidential campaign, chose to adopt a view closer to Trump’s. Trump has said that, were he president, he would have let Russia annex parts of Ukraine. When it comes to winning a GOP primary, taking the Trump position may prove to be the safest bet. That’s the side DeSantis picked, and now he’s forcing other presidential hopefuls and GOP leaders to make a different bet.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate