Atlanta Residents Could Soon Vote on Cop City

Organizers have less than 60 days to secure the signatures to force a vote in November.

Protesters gather outside Atlanta City Hall ahead of a council vote over whether to approve public funding for the construction of "Cop City," a proposed police and firefighter training center.Arvin Temkar/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Wednesday, an Atlanta city clerk approved a referendum petition from opponents of the Public Safety Training Center—now perhaps better known as “Cop City”—which is slated to be built on 100 acres of forest in a neighboring part of DeKalb county. If organizers are able to get roughly 75,000 signatures in the next 58 days, Atlantans will have the opportunity to vote on whether to cancel the lease of the city-owned land for the project. If that referendum passes, activists will have successfully stopped Cop City.

The effort was announced the day after the Atlanta City Council voted 11-4 to approve $31 million in public funding for the center, following a marathon meeting that featured more than 13 hours of testimony from hundreds of protesters and lasted through the night until 5:30 in the morning. The actual price will be even higher. Because of a “leaseback agreement,” the city will pay the Atlanta Police Foundation—the group that would maintain the facility—$1.2 million a year for the next 30 years, putting the total public cost closer to $67 million. The rest of the money, another $60 million, will come from the APF, a non-profit organization that lobbies on behalf of the police department. 

Those in favor of the project—a bipartisan coalition that includes Republican Gov. Brian Kemp, as well as a majority of Atlanta’s Democratic-leaning city council and its Democratic mayor, Andre Dickens—say that current police training facilities are substandard and that Cop City is needed to boost police retention and morale. The ideologically diverse coalition that has formed in opposition argues that the center will further militarize the police and destroy a forest that has been called one of the four “lungs” of Atlanta in official city documents. 

To say that opponents of the project have been the subject of repression would be an understatement. In January, Georgia State Patrol shot and killed a protester named Manuel Esteban Paez Terán in a hail of bullets during a raid on the forest where activists had been camped out for months attempting to block construction. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation said that Teran shot at officers first, but as I wrote in April, the autopsy undermined that claim. Since then, according to the Guardian, 42 people protesting against Cop City have been arrested and charged with domestic terrorism. Some were charged with terrorism for destroying police and construction vehicles, others for merely appearing to associate with the Defend The Atlanta Forest movement. 

In May, three activists were charged with felony intimidation of an officer of the state for posting fliers that called a cop who participated in the January raid a “murderer.” Earlier this month, at least a dozen officers in SWAT gear raided a house in Atlanta that was a well known local organizing hub. They arrested three activists connected to the Atlanta Solidarity Fund, an organization that has paid protesters’ legal expenses. These activists were charged with charity fraud and money laundering—allegations they vehemently deny. 

The Cop City referendum was modeled on a similar, successful effort undertaken in Camden County, Georgia, to stop the construction of a proposed rocket launch site. That referendum, which passed overwhelming, was upheld by the Georgia Supreme Court. According to the Cop City journalistic watchdog group ATL Press Collective, organizers have 60 days to collect the required signatures—but they only have 58 days to do so if they hope to place it on the November 7 ballot. If they miss that deadline, the referendum could appear on the ballot in March. Paul Glaze, an organizer with Cop City Vote Coalition, told Atlanta’s 11Alive that more than 3,000 volunteers have signed up to collect signatures. 

On June 7, activists announced their campaign plan at a press conference that featured speakers from the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and the Working Families Party. “The people need to have a voice on whether or not there is a cop city. The city council has failed over and over again to listen to the masses of people in Atlanta,” said Kamau Franklin, the founder of the local group Community Movement Builders, who spoke to Mother Jones in February. “We’re not contemplating failure. We’re contemplating what we do when we succeed and when we have to force the city to turn that forest back over to the people, and when we stop the city of Atlanta from militarizing its police to attack our community.”

A central question in the Cop City fight is whether or not most Atlanta residents actually want it built. In February, Mayor Dickens released a poll showing that 61 percent of respondents supported the public safety training facility and 26 percent opposed it. A separate poll in March by professors at Emory University found that just 48 percent supported it, while 46 percent opposed it.

In November, we may finally get an answer. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate