Ron DeSantis Hired a Rising Right-Wing Intellectual. The Campaign Just Fired Him After a Nazi-Meme Video.

Republicans yet again find associations with Nazism in their ranks.

Scott Olson/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

It happened again. A high-profile right-wing figure had to fire a staffer for connections with Nazi stuff. On Tuesday, according to Axios, the DeSantis campaign communications staffer Nate Hochman, somewhat famous as a rising intellectual on the right, was fired for creating a video with the Black Sun (also known as the Sonnenrad), a popular neo-Nazi symbol. 

The video, which concluded with DeSantisā€™s head at the center of the Black Sun emblazoned on the Florida flag, was first noticed by Republican strategist Luke Thompson on Sunday. Thompson wondered if it had been made in-house by the DeSantis team. Hochman had drawn attention to himself by retweeting it. (Hochman then removed his retweet.)

Soon after, Semafor reported Hochman’s firing and Axios confirmed he made the video. The New York Times also reported that a different homophobic DeSantis video questioning Trumpā€™s commitment to ending LGBTQ+ rights was also made by a DeSantis staffer. Itā€™s not clear if it was Hochman, who did not respond to a request for a comment.

Both videos are deeply regressive and clearly made to appeal to younger, “more based” portions of the internet. The Black Sun video from Sunday that got Hochman fired features years-old references to Terrorwave and Wojacks, a popular meme that rose to prominence on 4chan.

The Daily Beast noted that the account, @DeSantisCams, has posted other videos featuring DeSantis clips cut to videos of Nazis and Benito Mussolini. According to the publication, Hochman had retweeted the account six other times.

Funnily enough, the video didnā€™t even land well with its intended audience. One 4chan poster called it a ā€œcringy meme video.ā€ Other posters replied in a similar fashion: ā€œDesperation white supremacist astroturfingā€; ā€œpathetic that it was made by the campaign itself, laundered to 3rd party accounts to make it seem organic, then deleted anyway.ā€

This type of thingā€”an establishment figure or institution finding someone in their ranks associated with, or outright sympathizes with, right-wing ideas close to Nazism and then having to be firedā€”is not at all new. One of the most prominent and extreme examples happened in 2020 when Tucker Carlson fired a top staffer for posting racist content. In 2021, the Texas GOP had to fire a staffer who posted a video from the Capitol Riot and who posted Pizzagate conspiracy theories. Samuel Francis was famously fired from the Washington Times for talking at a eugenicist conference and saying that the ā€œgenetic endowmentsā€ of white people made them the ā€œcreating peopleā€ of Europe and America. Hochman, fittingly, has cited Francis in the past. (As have many on the New Right who loved his phrase “anarcho-tyranny.”) 

This also isnā€™t the first time that Hochman has gotten himself into trouble for associating with white nationalists. In 2022, he took part in a Twitter Space with white nationalist influencer Nick Fuentes. The Dispatch, which obtained the audio of the conversation, quoted Hochman saying that ā€œNickā€™s probably a better influence than Ben Shapiro on young men who might otherwise be conservatives,ā€ and said that ā€œthere are good thingsā€ about ā€œthe fact that kids are listening.ā€ He noted that he has ā€œrespectā€ for some of Fuentesā€™s work. 

Hochmanā€™s specific motivations in posting the Black Sun DeSantis arenā€™t clear. A generous reading is that he is not a neo-Nazi, but is cynical (and sympathetic enough) to want them in Desantisā€™s coalition. The most critical reading is that, well, he is a neo-Nazi. It doesnā€™t matter much either way. Thereā€™s another meme: If you have 10 people at a dinner table and one Nazi, you’re having dinner with 11 Nazis.”

Anyway, remember this tweet?

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate