DeSantis Criticized for Not Being Anti-Abortion Enough

The Republican presidential candidates are fighting about who wants to restrict access the most.

Ron DeSantis stands with his arms raised in front of a podium that says "Protect Life"

John Raoux/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In April, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a six-week abortion ban into law. Still, that is not enough to prove he’s truly committed to being an anti-abortion advocate.

This week, in an interview with Megyn Kelly, DeSantis touted the Florida law as “the most significant pro-life protections that we’ve ever done,” and promised to “come down on the side of life.” When Kelly pressed him on if that meant he supported a federal law banning abortion, DeSantis reiterated: “I’m proud to be pro-life and I’ll be a pro-life president.”

For anti-abortion advocates, DeSantis’ statement did not make clear he would go beyond millions of American women losing access to reproductive healthcare after Dobbs. They want a federal ban. Following this interview, leading anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America decried the governor’s remarks. SBA President Marjorie Dannenfelser said his response was “unacceptable” and that DeSantis was failing to be the “National Defender of Life” that the American people deserve. 

Presidential hopefuls former Vice President Mike Pence and Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.tC.) chimed in too. “When I am President,” Pence posted, “I will always champion protections for the unborn in states across the Country and in our Nation’s Capital!” linking to Dannenfelser’s statement. “Republicans should not be retreating on life,” Scott said on X, tagging SBA.

For former Vice-President Pence and Sen. Scott, this was a chance to say: Look at us! We’re even more anti-abortion than the other guy! But the haste from Republican primary candidates to denounce DeSantis represents a fundamental incongruence with the declared conservative position of states’ rights.

In his interview with Kelly, DeSantis said that he views anti-abortion legislation as a “bottom-up movement.” As president, he would strive to be a “leader with the bully pulpit to help local communities and states advance the cause of life.” Their discussion was less about if abortion should be illegal across the country, and more about if Congress would be the one to impose bans instead of state legislatures. DeSantis did not outright come out against a national ban. Instead, he suggested it’s likely not possible under a federalist system.

If a nationwide six-week abortion ban was possible—which is what Mike Pence supports and what pregnant people are already experiencing in several states—it would result in even more women dying. According to researchers, if abortion is banned throughout the United States, maternal deaths would rise by 24 percent. And for Black women, it would be 39 percent. People often do not know they are pregnant at this stage: Six weeks pregnant is two weeks after a missed period; 14 percent to 25 percent of women of childbearing age experience irregular menstruation. This all, of course, is on top of the overwhelming and disqualifying logistics: having time and money; locating a clinic; acquiring medication; getting off of work; finding someone to watch the kids.

DeSantis’ purportedly weak anti-abortion stance would still put four million Floridians of reproductive age at risk of losing care under the law passed in April. These restrictions ripple out to the entire country, too. As Mother Jones reported last year, Florida abortion clinics had served as a resource for patients in the region. 

That effect is already being felt. This past March, a Florida woman named Deborah Dorbert carried to term a baby with no kidneys. Her doctors predicted this, but she was unable to get an abortion in her state. Instead, she held him as he took his last breath—living only for 99 minutes. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate