Trump’s Arrest Is a Reminder Mugshots Are Bad

In most cases, a photo of someone at one of their lowest points is evil. But this might be the one exception.

There is a centered photo of former President Donald J. Trump in the center of the illustration, that is toned to black and gray and sits on a gray background. The same photo is repeated four times—two to the left of the center image and two to the right. There are five red 'X' marks, and one is overlaid on each of the five Donald Trump images.

Mother Jones; Ron Elkman/Sports Imagery/ Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

One of the glaring ironies of former president Donald Trump (and his cronies) facing accountability for their attempts to subvert the democratic process is that Republicans have been forced to acknowledge the indignities of the American criminal legal system

After witnessing the conditions that alleged January 6th insurrectionists faced at the infamous Southeast DC jail, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) spoke out about inhumane conditions. As my colleague Isabela Dias reported at the time, it wasn’t until this attention from Republicans that there was much recognition of the jail’s deplorable state—even though activists had been calling attention to the poor treatment of the jail’s predominantly Black population for years. (Later, Greene would also call for Congress to “defund” the FBI after they raided Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago; reform to abolition is a well-worn route for anti-carceral activists). 

Today, we will experience another example of this kind of crossover: Donald Trump is set to turn himself into Fulton County Jail for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election and he will be issued a mugshot. This image will live in infamy and will likely energize his base. It will set social media aflame. It will keep T-shirt mavens and MAGA memorabilia entrepreneurs busy for years. And I am sure Resistance liberals will have a lot of fun. A lot of people will: The opportunity to see someone like Trump, who has so brazenly flouted the law, get even a little bit of comeuppance is sure to be cathartic. And like most things involving Trump, it will be unbelievably stupid, and really funny, and yet serious.

But like the case of the Southeast DC jail, it will also be a chance to think about a wider system. The vast majority of criminal cases do not involve a public figure like Trump or a crime as large as subverting an election. And in almost every instance: The media should not be in the business of publishing mugshots.

People’s mugshots are regularly published in the papers and online, often well before they face trial or are even convicted of a crime. These aren’t “Wanted” posters; there is no good reason to publish the picture of someone at their lowest point, after they’ve already been booked and charged. As the media critic Adam Johnson wrote, the widespread publishing of mugshots “leads to summary public shaming, firings, diminished social status—all before a trial has even taken place. In the age of SEO, it’s a form of extrajudicial punishment that largely harms the poor and people of color.” 

On top of that, the existence of a person’s mugshot on the internet can follow them for years, much longer than whatever legal case they were dealing with at the time. As The Guardian reported in 2018, there is a cottage industry of websites like Mugshots.com and Arrests.com that compile mugshots and then charge people exorbitant fees to remove them from the internet. 

It’s true, mugshots are public records and the First Amendment allows journalists to publish them. But is it the right thing to do? As Marjorie Taylor Greene once discovered, the American penal system is already needlessly punitive and dehumanizing. When Trump’s mugshot debuts later today, sure, let a thousand memes bloom. But it’s a decent reminder that most of the time the practice is completely unnecessary.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate