It’s Now Clear: “Cop City” Is About Democracy

Atlanta officials have been evasive on how to verify over 100,000 petition signatures in support of putting the $90 million training center up for a vote.

Miguel Martinez/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Last Wednesday, US District Judge Mark Cohen criticized Atlanta officials for refusing to verify over 100,000 petition signatures submitted in the effort to put a police training facility that has become known as “Cop City” up for a vote. Dubbed “Cop City” by Atlanta residents, this proposed $90 million facility would partially raze one of Atlanta’s few remaining forests. Since the Atlanta City Council voted to approve public funding for the project in June, activists have pursued a referendum strategy to put the training facility on the November 7 ballot. 

Citing the city’s shifting goalposts and its recent claim that the “Cop City” referendum process isn’t even legal, Cohen expressed his frustration over the current state of affairs, writing, “The City could have avoided the conundrum that exists now” but instead “opted to approve a petition for a referendum it believed and later contended was illegal. A proverb dating back over four centuries ago once again applies here: Honesty is the Best Policy.”

Atlanta officials’ inconsistency combined with their refusal to begin the petition verification process has emphasized a point activists have been making for the past two years: the fate of “Cop City” is about democracy. How can Georgia’s leaders claim to be defenders of democracy when their own constituents are denied basic voting rights? 

Prominent political leaders in Georgia appear to be finally waking up to that fact. Former Georgia State Representative Stacey Abrams’ voting rights group, Fair Fight Action, has spoken up against the city’s proposed plan to use signature matching, a process that disproportionately disenfranchises marginalized voters, to verify the “Cop City” referendum petition. Last weekend Abrams entered the fray herself, announcing her support for putting “Cop City” on the ballot. “The rarely-used citizen referendum is designed for precisely this type of fraught issue,” she told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. “Regardless of one’s position on the subject matter, the leadership of the city should make every effort to allow direct citizen engagement by vote.”

Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Georgia), one of the key architects of the Freedom to Vote Act. which would establish national standards for voting rights and challenge suppression tactics, joined Abrams in calling for a fairer process. In a letter to Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens last weekend, the senator expressed concern with the city’s inconsistent rules, calling on officials to “err on the side of giving people the ability to express their views” and create “greater clarity around its process for verifying petition submissions.” As of Monday morning, more than 80 civil rights groups, including Black Voters Matter, the Center for Popular Democracy, and Georgia Conservation Voters, have called on the Atlanta City Council to commit to a referendum on the lease and funding for the police training center. 

Meanwhile, more than 60 people were indicted on RICO charges last week by the state attorney general, for their alleged connections to Stop Cop City and Defend the Forest movements. (This is the same law Atlanta prosecutors used to charge former President Donald Trump for attempting to overturn the 2020 election and rapper Young Thug for his role in what officials say is a street gang.) Many of the Cop City activists who were indicted also face domestic terrorism charges after engaging in demonstrations in the spring. The RICO case, which is being pursued by Republican state attorney Chris Carr, has been condemned by the ACLU, the National Lawyers Guild, and the Southern Center for Human Rights. Just two days after the indictment, a group of faith leaders were arrested for chaining themselves to a bulldozer at the proposed construction site of the police training facility.

Mary Hooks, an organizer with the Stop Cop City Vote Coalition and head of the Highlander Center, which trained Rosa Parks in direct action and helped incubate the 1964 Freedom Summer, made it clear the action was in service of democracy. “We’re here to assert the people’s will,” she said outside of the construction site. “We will not be deterred.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate