Why Did It Take So Long for Dems to Turn Against Bob Menendez?

The corruption scandal swirling around New Jersey’s senior senator was entirely predictable.

Bob Menendez, Phil Murphy, Cory Booker

Sen. Bob Menendez, left, stands with New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy and Sen. Cory Booker at Menendez's 2018 reelection campaign launch.Julio Cortez/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Within hours of Sen. Robert Menendez’s indictment Friday on bribery charges, prominent members of his party were already calling on the New Jersey Democrat to resign. “These are serious charges that implicate national security and the integrity of our criminal justice system,” Gov. Phil Murphy said in a statement. “The alleged facts are so serious that they compromise the ability of Senator Menendez to effectively represent the people of our state.” Democratic politicians and party officials from across the state concurred. On Saturday, third-term Rep. Andy Kim announced he would challenge Menendez in next year’s primary.

The speed with which Democrats have moved to jettison Menendez presumably has a lot to do with the jaw-dropping levels of corruption alleged by the Justice Department. The indictment details a stunning conspiracy in which, according to prosecutors, Menendez abused his position as the top-ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to secretly aid the government of Egypt and improperly intervene in multiple criminal cases in exchange for hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of bribes—including cash, gold bars, a luxury car, and a “low-or-no-show job” for the senator’s wife at a halal meat certification company.

It’s a massive scandal in its own right. But at a time when Democrats are desperately trying to convince voters that Donald Trump is too corrupt and too big of a threat to democracy to be president again, it’s also a political nightmare. “How can we ask Americans to vote against an indicted Trump, but for an indicted Democratic Senator, especially with evidence this damning?” wrote former New Jersey Democratic Rep. Tom Malinowski, whose own stint in Congress was marred by an ethics scandal. “We are at a critical time in our country’s history, and we face significant challenges and specific threats…we cannot be distracted,” added New Jersey Rep. Donald Norcross, the brother of one of the state’s most influential power brokers.

By Friday evening, there was a palpable sense of moral triumphalism among anti-Trump commentators. “In calling for Menendez to step down NJ Dems and others showing there really is a difference between the two parties,” tweeted the Washington Post’s Jennifer Rubin. “Now Senate Ds need to follow.”

Here’s the thing, though: Even if some of the brazen details in the Menendez indictment would have been impossible to imagine before Friday, the broad outlines of the corruption accusations were entirely predictable. Menendez has faced remarkably similar allegations before, but Senate Democrats chose to put him back in charge of the Foreign Relations committee as soon as it was politically tenable to do so. As my colleague Dan Friedman explains:

In 2015, he was charged with using his office to do favors for a Florida eye doctor, Salomon Melgen, who lavished Menendez with luxury items and free travel. Menendez, who claimed he and Melgen were simply friends who exchanged gifts, avoided conviction after a hung jury caused a mistrial in 2017. Melgen was convicted of Medicare fraud in 2017, but President Donald Trump commuted his 17-year prison sentence.

In a 2018 letter “severely” admonishing Menendez after the trial, the Senate Ethics Committee criticized him for accepting and failing to disclose “numerous things of value from Dr. Melgen, including, but not limited to, travel on private and commercial flights, a luxury hotel stay in Paris, and lodging on 19 occasions at a Dominican Republic villa.” While receiving those gifts, the committee found, Menendez used his office “to advance Dr. Melgen’s personal and business interests” by intervening with a government agency in a Medicare billing dispute, helping Melgen protect a contract in the Domican Republic, and helping “foreign nationals obtain visas to visit Dr. Melgen in the United States, including, in one case, appealing directly to a U.S. ambassador to seek reconsideration of a visa denial.”

In 2015, as now, Menendez stepped down from his powerful Foreign Relations Committee leadership role after being indicted. But in general, Democrats stuck by him. As the New Jersey Globe noted yesterday, Murphy, who was running for governor during the 2017 trial, “remained a Menendez ally.” Murphy, Norcross, and Sen. Cory Booker all gave heavily to Menendez’s legal defense fund.

After the mistrial, New Jersey’s infamous Democratic machines closed ranks around Menendez. Murphy and Booker gave full-throated endorsements at his 2018 reelection kick-off (“This is the man that we need in this fight,” Booker declared), and he faced no credible primary challengers. Hillary Clinton appeared at a Menendez fundraiser. And, most significantly, Senate Democrats agreed to restore his committee post. That decision, as Friedman writes, “gave Menendez the power that the Justice Department now alleges he used corruptly.”

In that sense, the Democratic Party’s collective decision Friday to hold Menendez accountable doesn’t seem quite so swift. One could argue that it came eight years too late.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate