Heroes Back on Track

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


mojo-photo-heroes1106.jpgIt’s been a rough couple weeks for the “little X-Men that could,” as NBC’s breakout hit from last season seemed to wilt under the pressure of being, well, NBC’s only breakout hit from last season. The first episodes so far this season have been both confusing and kind of dull, with our heroes scattered around the world (and throughout time), one of them even affected with amnesia in, well, a place people are often affected with amnesia, actually: a bar in Ireland. I’d come close to giving up on the show, to be honest, but a scene two weeks ago hinted at intriguing directions to come: a new villain, Maury, the father of Matt the mind-reading policeman, emerged with the ability to trap you in a literal nightmare, oblivious to the outside world. The two nightmare scenes had a minimal beauty and elemental terror, hinting at how the show has often achieved surprising, unique moments.

This week, the tangled plot lines seemed to finally come into focus, and suddenly, in retrospect, the long buildup seems like an envelope-pushing experiment rather than aimless wandering. The show was at its best last season when it hinted at the apocalyptic future that might have been (if the heroes hadn’t done their job right); last night’s episode finally revealed this season’s “what if,” a threat even scarier than that New York bomb: a virus (“Shanti”) that will apparently kill “93%” of the world’s population. The scenes of an abandoned New York City, refugees marching through a containment center, echoed last year’s great Children of Men, again showing how Heroes often aims way above typical TV.

Nightmare guy showed up again too, giving Matt a chance to shine in a great scene that was weighty with symbolism: father and son both attempting to trap each other permanently in a nightmare comprised of their apartment on the day dad abandoned his family. Ulp. Think of all the money you’d save on therapy if you could do that!

Non-mutant non-superhero researcher Suresh has always been a kind of annoying character, almost willfully blinded by his search for scientific truth, colluding with baddies as if he could stay above it all. This episode, he finally admitted as much, in a refreshing bit of honesty that also felt a little like giving the viewers a voice (as the show’s sometime narrator): he reveals to the Company that he’s been working against them, and that he’s not sure who’s right and who’s wrong any more. Tell me about it! Self-healing cheerleader Claire’s dad was such a creepy baddie for so long last season it was really tough to adjust to him being a daughter-protecting, family-loving good guy; but last night, he too seemed to reemerge as a compromised character.

Next week, the previews promised, our questions will be answered, and thank Shanti for that. Has (apparently immortal) Brit baddie Adam really been harboring his grudge against Hiro for, like, a thousand years? How did Peter survive the supposedly involuntary blowing-up in the sky at the end of last season? And can we have some more naked hose-down shots of Peter, by the way? Speaking of gayitude, that’s one area the show continues to disappoint: like Star Trek, its plot seems designed for maximum diversity, with characters of every conceivable ethnic background, and multiple mixed-race romantic couples. The whole point is the heroes are everybody, the heroes are us. Like usual, though, apparently no homos can be heroes, or even friends with heroes. In a show that does so much right, it’s an inexcusable oversight. Plus how awesome would it be if one of the Petrellis was queer?

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate