Grammy Nominees: The Right-On and the Random

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


mojo-photo-grammysart.jpgBy now everyone’s seen the big news about the Grammy nods: Kanye gets a bunch, Amy Winehouse gets almost as many, and Bruce gets denied in the Album of the Year category. Since the Grammy nominees have about as much to do with good music as, I dunno, the contestants on America’s Next Top Model have to do with human beauty, it doesn’t really pay to fret about who’s been unjustly denied a nomination. What’s more interesting is finding evidence there are some serious weed smokers in the nominating committees, allowing both compelling and completely baffling nods to slip through.

First up, Best Short Form Video may be the strangest combination of artists in the whole list, with the late Johnny Cash competing with iPod shiller Feist, French disco-dancers Justice, pop-soul duo Gnarls Barkley, and pop-rock combo Mute Math. Remember that Mute Math video, “Typical,” I put it in a “Neato Viddys” a few months back. It’s backwards and nutty!

Best Remix (Non-Classical) is always an amusing category, at least if you try to imagine stodgy old Grammy voters putting a 12″ on the turntable and dancing around the sitting room. Italian dance producer Benny Benassi gets a nod for his dull Public Enemy remix, as does Eric Prydz for his slightly more tolerable take on Pink Floyd (both of these featuring artists Grammy voters might recognize). However, Carl Craig’s remix of Junior Boys’ “Like a Child” is a bit of a surprise here. I found a homemade video of doofy snapshots on YouTube that features the whole song, so you can give it a listen:

Its oddly atonal take on the original doesn’t even get a bass drum until late in the 4th minute; were Grammy voters just reading Pitchfork for ideas?

Best Surround Sound Album is also a pretty funny category: talk about an opportunity to get out the weed and head into your 73-speaker listening room. Along with a few symphonies and The Beatles, Oklahoman art-instigators The Flaming Lips have landed in this category with the surround-sound mix of At War With the Mystics, their 2006 album that featured “The W.A.N.D.,” a Dungen-like piece inspiring riff-tastic psychedelia. You can’t get the full surround-sound experience on YouTube, but it’s still fun to watch:

Otherwise, even most of the nominations I’m kind of pleased by are “repeat” nods for previously-nominated artists (see the Chems for Best Dance Recording, Beck for Solo Rock Vocal), a syndrome which has its penultimate expression in the Album of the Year entry for Herbie Hancock, whose entire audience now appears to be Grammy voters. Even the Best Alternative Music Album, typically a bastion of credibility, is kind of underwhelming: Bjork’s Volta doesn’t deserve to be there at all, and everybody likes Lily Allen, but a Grammy?

Finally, it’s bittersweet to see UGK in the Rap Duo or Group category, just days after the untimely death of member Pimp C. Let’s check out the video for “International Player’s Anthem” again, it’s so great.

The winners are announced on February 10th, 2008.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate