Peace Out: Blackwater Splits with Trade Group that Promotes the ‘Peace and Stability’ Industry

Mired in controversy after its operators killed 17 Iraqi civilians, Blackwater quietly dissociated itself with the International Peace Operations Association, an organization that reps for the private military industry’s biggest players.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


While its operators stand accused of firing indiscriminately on Iraqi civilians, killing 17 and wounding 24 in a September 16 shooting in Baghdad, Blackwater USA quietly withdrew its membership yesterday from the International Peace Operations Association (IPOA), a Washington, D.C.-based trade group that represents some of the private military industry’s biggest players. “We have decided to take a hiatus from the [association],” a Blackwater spokesperson told the Wall Street Journal, which first reported the story. “We, like many other organizations engaged in this type of work, are pursuing other aspects and methods of industry outreach and governance.” The IPOA did not issue a public statement, but Blackwater’s name and logo have been removed from the list of member companies appearing on the organization’s website. Doug Brooks, the IPOA’s founder and president, confirmed the decision by phone earlier today. He declined to comment on the details of Blackwater’s departure, but denied it had resulted from any action undertaken by other IPOA members, either by companies uncomfortable with sharing an association with Blackwater or by those who may stand to gain commercially from its demise. “They were members in good standing when they pulled out,” Brooks told me. “They made the decision.”

Blackwater was a founding member of the IPOA, which currently represents 38 companies active in what it calls “the peace and stability industry.” Having started with six companies in April 2001, the organization’s membership has grown rapidly since the U.S. invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, as private military companies have sought the sheen of legitimacy provided by the IPOA’s well-intentioned, but largely unenforceable code of conduct, which emphasizes respect for human rights, ethics, transparency, and corporate accountability. The IPOA’s commitment to these ideals stood to be tested by the recent involvement of Blackwater operators in several controversial shooting incidents in Iraq. Just last week the association issued a press release stating that it “does not condone reckless or dangerous behavior” and acknowledging that it was “actively working with Blackwater, both through our Standards Committee and our Executive Committee, to ensure that they are fully compliant with the IPOA Code of Conduct.”

The company’s sudden withdrawal from the association, however, further calls into question IPOA’s ability to police its membership. According to Robert Young Pelton, author of Licensed to Kill: Hired Guns in the War on Terror, who shadowed Blackwater operators working in Iraq as he researched his book, the company’s abrupt departure from the trade group may be the result of pressure from the State Department, the company’s primary contracting agency, to keep a lower profile following the September 16 shootings. “Doug Brooks is pretty vocal in the media,” said Pelton. “State is usually the one that smacks Blackwater in the back of the head to say, ‘Shut the fuck up! You’re not supposed to talk while there’s a pending investigation.’ So, my guess is that this is a State-mandated decision, which is why Doug is saying nothing about it.”

Blackwater did not return a call for comment. Apart from the company’s initial statement to the Wall Street Journal, it has not commented publicly on its decision. But according to an associate of Blackwater founder and CEO Erik Prince, the company is not overly concerned about going it alone. “It doesn’t surprise me that they may have pulled out,” the source wrote in an email. “The IPOA doesn’t have any particular influence over its membership or pull on the Hill. It’s the fucking blind leading the blind.”

Meanwhile, two other private military companies associated with Prince, Virginia-based Total Intelligence Solutions and Barbados-based Greystone Limited, remain IPOA members.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate