Who Is GOP Presidential Candidate Thaddeus McCotter?

Rep. Thaddeus McCotter (R-Mich.) at the Republican Leadership Conference in Louisiana.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/5843826695/">Gage Skidmore</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When Rep. Thaddeus McCotter (R-Mich.) announced that he would run for president at the beginning of July, Republican voters replied with a collective “Who?”—if they even caught the news at all. A month later, if his appearance Friday morning at the Des Moines Register’s Iowa State Fair soapbox was any indication, McCotter’s only just begun to get his name out. “I’d never heard about him until the last week or so,” said Martha Meyer, an undecided voter from Pleasant Hill, Iowa. (The notable exception here is in Michigan, where McCotter recently polled ahead of former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty, for whom Saturday’s Ames Straw Poll could be a make-or-break moment.)

McCotter, a mild-mannered Midwesterner with engaging dry wit, hails from Livonia in metropolitan Detroit. He was first elected to Congress in 2002, after stints as a lawyer, county commissioner, and state senator. He is notable for his quirkiness, playing in a band called the Second Amendments and quoting Led Zeppelin from the House floor. “You need to see Thad as an artist, not a politician,” an associate explained to the Detroit News.

Part Tea Party conservative, part nonconformist, the 45-year-old McCotter distinguishes himself from the pack with his unapologetic support for blue-collar workers. He’s among a handful of Republican representatives who voted for the auto industry bailout, a minimum wage raise, and collective bargaining agreements. On the soapbox, he said that Wall Street banks should be “restructured and recapitalized without taxpayer money” and vowed to deregulate a “highly bureaucratic Washington,” but acknowledged that Americans “believe in a social safety net to help those who cannot help themselves, as Lincoln taught us.” (He still opposes Obamacare.)

In Congress, McCotter’s intellectual reputation earned him chairmanship of the Republican Policy Committee in 2006. But last year, he irked colleagues by proposing that the committee be disolved so its $360,000 budget could go toward reducing the federal deficit. Then-GOP whip Eric Cantor intervened and replaced McCotter with Georgia Rep. Tom Price.

By all indications, McCotter faces impossibly long odds to secure his party’s nomination for president. While he clearly recognizes where he stands—he harbored no resentment for his exclusion from Thursday’s debate in Iowa, conceding that “you generate your own traction”—he still says that his primary goal is “to win” the election. (Otherwise, he said, why bother?) During his speech, McCotter, who is balding, joked that “the top two qualifications for a president are good hair and makeup.”

Des Moines resident Rick Ryan agreed with that sentiment. He said that the Republican candidates had all failed to impress him, but this was his first real introduction to McCotter. “I like him. He’s not about telling people what they want to hear, he’s telling people what they need to hear.” Still, Ryan wasn’t ready to endorse the Michigan representative. “There’s really no cut-and-dried winner out there,” he said.

Some pundits predict that McCotter will soon give up his presidential bid to defend his House seat, which the Democratic National Committee has targeted as “vulnerable” in 2012. Others figure he’s just running to hawk his new book, Seize Freedom! (a charge commonly brought against Newt Gingrich). But the congressman spent $18,000 to secure a tent at the Ames Straw Poll, and at the fair he hinted that he would at least stick it out through the New Hampshire primary in February.

“We just started the campaign about a month ago, and I have too much respect for the people of Iowa to think that you just bounce in and expect to have a wonderful result,” McCotter said. “So we treat it as an introduction rather than a test of organization.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate