Official at Center of Bridge Scandal Was Christie’s “Eyes, Ears” at Port Authority

A 2012 article contradicts Christie’s claims on the embattled Port Authority bureaucrat.

Brian Cassella/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


On Thursday, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie held a press conference to distance himself from the growing scandal over allegations that his staff  orchestrated a massive, week-long traffic jam on access ramps to the George Washington Bridge to exact political revenge on a mayor who refused to endorse Christie in last year’s election.

At the press conference, Christie denied any “emotional relationship and closeness” with his high-school classmate David Wildstein, the Port Authority official at the center of the scandal. “David and I were not friends in high school,” Christie said. “We were not even acquaintances in high school…We didn’t travel in the same circles in high school. You know, I was the class president and athlete. I don’t know what David was doing during that period of time.” Wildstein, who ordered the lane closures that led to the traffic jam, resigned his Port Authority post last month. On Wednesday, in response to a subpoena, Wildstein gave state lawmakers emails and text messages about the scandal, including an email that appears to show Christie’s deputy chief of staff instructing him to create “traffic problems.” (Christie fired the deputy chief of staff, Bridget Anne Kelly, on Thursday morning.)

Christie and Wildstein may have traveled in different circles when they went to school together in the late 1970s, but they appear to have developed a kinship since then. Christie appointed Wildstein to a newly created position at the Port Authority, director of interstate capital projects, in 2010. And a March, 2012 article in the Record, a daily newspaper based in northern New Jersey, appears to contradict Christie’s claim that he has no current ties to his high-school classmate. The piece details how Wildstein’s colleagues viewed him as the “eyes and ears” of the governor’s office at the Port Authority, someone with a “political agenda rather than one built on reform or improving the region’s transportation system.” The Record‘s article, drawn from anonymous interviews with other Port Authority employees, paints Wildstein as a Christie loyalist, one with an unfailing devotion to pushing the governor’s goals and who was understood to represent the governor’s voice at meetings.

From the article:

Inside the agency’s headquarters, Wildstein plays a central role in decisions that affect the public. 

He keeps a close watch on the agency’s $1 billion project to raise the Bayonne Bridge, a big priority for the governor, and construction of a new Goethals Bridge, a top official familiar with his work said. Wildstein helped carry out the decision to strip most Port Authority employees and retirees of free E-ZPass privileges after Christie criticized the perk. 

Several executives said Wildstein has played a role in placing some of those recommended by the Christie administration in jobs and that he seems to serve as the administration’s eyes and ears within the byzantine agency.

On Thursday afternoon, New Jersey lawmakers held a hearing to ask Wildstein about his role in the lane closures. He refused to answer any questions, citing his Fifth-Amendment right to refuse to incriminate himself. (The US attorney’s office in New Jersey has launched a criminal probe into the circumstances surrounding the traffic jam.) The New Jersey General Assembly’s transportation, public works, and independent authorities committee held Wildstein in contempt.

This post has been updated.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate