How Far Will GOP Candidates Go to Get Into Next Week’s Debate?

Only self-immolation is off the table.

Rand Paul takes a chainsaw to the US tax code.randpaul.com

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Trailing in the polls, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee grabbed the media’s attention this weekend by claiming that President Barack Obama’s nuclear agreement with Iran is “marching the Israelis to the door of the oven.” On Friday, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz made headlines by calling fellow Republican Mitch McConnell—the Senate Majority Leader—a liar on the Senate floor. A few days before that, Rand Paul literally took a chainsaw to the tax code over an electric-guitar rendition of the “Star Spangled Banner.”

The first Republican presidential debate is next Thursday on Fox News. And under rules set by Fox (with the blessing of the Republican National Committee), just 10 of the 16 declared major candidates—those with the highest average in the five most recent national polls leading up to the debate—will get a spot on the stage. Participants in the second debate, hosted by CNN in September, will also be selected based largely on polling averages. The result is a last-minute scramble by the candidates to crack the top 10 any way they can.

“So what’s the best way to make news?” asks Republican strategist Ford O’Connell. “Say something that’s a little bit off-color.”

Following the circus of 20 GOP primary debates during the last presidential cycle, the party establishment has worked hard this year to limit the number of debates and participants. But the strategy has launched a game of headline-making one-upmanship as candidates seek to raise their profiles and poll numbers. A spot on the debate stage means more press coverage, which in turn means more fundraising and a better shot at the nomination.

Thus far, a shoo-in for the first debate is Donald Trump, the real estate mogul who has dominated headlines and polls by saying the kinds of things—such as suggesting immigrants from Mexico are “rapists“—that the Republican establishment was hoping to avoid this election cycle. Also making the cut so far, according to NBC News, in descending order of polling numbers, are: Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, Huckabee, Cruz, celebrity surgeon Ben Carson, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, and former Texas Gov. Rick Perry. Falling just below the cutoff are Ohio Gov. John Kasich, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, businesswoman Carly Fiorina, and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham. The difference between 10th-place Perry and 11th-place Kasich is 0.2 percentage points. (Former New York Gov. George Pataki wasn’t included in NBC’s averages.)

“So what’s the best way to make news?” asks Republican strategist Ford O’Connell. “Say something that’s a little bit off-color.”

The battle for media coverage is made that much tougher because Trump is “sucking up all the oxygen in the room,” says O’Connell, who worked on John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign. But O’Connell doesn’t blame Fox or the RNC for the frenzied rush to make it into the top 10 and the “off-color” comments it’s producing. With 16 declared candidates, they have to winnow the field somehow to make the debates work, he says.

In a Wall Street Journal op-ed Sunday, RNC communications director Sean Spicer defended Fox’s strategy of limiting the debate to the top 10 candidates based on national polls. And he noted that Fox and CNN will both host secondary debates for the candidates who don’t make the top 10.

Currently in 12th place, Santorum has lashed out at Fox News and the RNC, arguing that the setup gives Fox News undue influence over who gets to participate in the debates. “What’s driving national numbers is news coverage,” Santorum told reporters at the weekly Christian Science Monitor Breakfast in Washington earlier this month. “They control in some respects the ability to put their thumb on the scale.”

In at least one way, Fox News is the big winner. In an effort to stay in the stop 10, Christie bought $250,000 of ad time this week on the conservative news network. And Christie’s investment is a pittance compared to the millions, according to the New York Times, that some super-PACs affiliated with the candidates have already spent to advertise on Fox to raise their candidates’ profiles among Republican voters.

How far will Republicans go to get attention? “I’m drawing the line at self-immolation,” Paul said in a Boston Herald Radio interview last week. “None of us are going to set ourselves on fire.” But, he acknowledged, he did set the tax code on fire.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate