Grammy Nominees Not Terrible?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


mojo-photo-grammys.jpgAs everyone knows, the Grammys are dumb. I’ve mocked the ceremony (and also an imagined ceremony in my brain) as well as the tendency of the lists of nominees to look like a stoned 80-year-old decided them. So, granted, my expectations are very low, but a quick glance at this year’s nods has left me with a distinct lack of disgust, and my eyebrows might have even gone up a bit in appreciation. Just a little!

First up, Record of the Year, by which, kids, they mean, “single.” There are, of course, other great songs that existed this year, but I wouldn’t argue with any of these:

I might even say the Coldplay song is the worst one on there, since I kind of like that Leona Lewis number. And hey, London soul crooner Adele, who knew any Americans had even heard of you? But the shocker here is M.I.A., whose “Paper Planes” became an unexpected breakout hit after appearing in the Pineapple Express trailer. This is a song, remember, that had to have its chorus gunshot noises censored for David Letterman.

Album of the year also featured some surprises:

In Rainbows is my pick (sigh), but the real story there is Lil Wayne, since it’s been rare for the Grammys to recognize hip-hop in the Album of the Year category, let alone one as, erm, explicit as Wayne.

All told, Lil Wayne leads the field this year with eight total nominations, while Coldplay is right behind him with seven. Deeper in the list, the Dance nominees included Party Ben faves Daft Punk, for a track from their live album, and Sam Sparro, the openly gay Australian crooner whose moody, triple-time “Black & Gold” is actually barely danceable. Of course, the Grammys reassert their quirky sense of humor by nominating Cyndi Lauper in the Best Electronic Album category, but hey, there’s Swedish singer Robyn, whose self-released comeback album took like seven years to get to America. Radiohead’s “House of Cards” escapes the Alt ghetto for Rock Performance and Rock Song nods, while In Rainbows is joined by Beck, Death Cab, Gnarls Barkley and My Morning Jacket for a rather dull Alt Album category. The Rap Solo category has five strong contenders: Jay-Z, Lil Wayne, Lupe Fiasco, Nas, and Snoop, whose “Sexual Eruption” doesn’t actually feature any rapping, I’d just like to point out. Rap Song also gives a nod to “Swagga Like Us,” which could be considered another M.I.A. nod, really. And in case you were wondering, Kathy Griffin’s year-long effort to get a nomination for her comedy album (even naming it For Your Consideration) actually paid off. Freakiest nomination? LA punk rockers No Age for Best Recording Package? Ding.

Of course, this is an awards ceremony that could barely be less relevant, with its 50th-anniversary broadcast in February gaining just barely on the event’s typically anemic ratings. Whether these ever-so-slightly more attentive nods will gain any more attention from the listening public is yet to be seen, but at least Sam Sparro should be happy.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate