Roy Moore Wins GOP Nomination for Alabama Senate Race

It was Luther Strange and Donald Trump vs. Roy Moore.

US Senate candidate Roy Moore rode a horse to his polling place Tuesday.Brynn Anderson/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Update, Sept. 26, 9:40 ET: Roy Moore has won the runoff to become the GOP nominee for Alabama’s special Senate election.

Alabama voters went to the polls Tuesday for a GOP primary election that’s being billed as a “battle for the soul of the Republican Party.” The contest—a runoff between incumbent Sen. Luther Strange and Roy Moore, an extreme right-wing former chief justice of the state’s Supreme Court—will determine the party’s nominee for a US Senate special election scheduled for December.

The race has taken on national significance, with President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence backing Strange, who was temporarily appointed to fill the seat vacated earlier this year when Sen. Jeff Sessions was confirmed as Trump’s attorney general. Strange is seen as the establishment candidate in the race; since taking office, he’s sided with the president on 92 percent of votes, according to FiveThirtyEight. Strange’s loyalty to Trump hasn’t gone unnoticed.

Despite Strange’s campaign vastly outspending Moore’s and getting nearly $11 million dollars of support from allies, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and other GOP leaders, several recent polls have shown Moore with a double-digit lead.

Moore is a colorful figure with a flair for drama—and extremism. As we explained last month:

In 2003, Moore was dismissed from the bench after he refused to remove a 5,280-pound Ten Commandments monument that he had installed at night without permission, despite a court order from another judge who ruled that the religious statue was unconstitutional. Alabama voters reelected Moore to the high court again in 2012, but Moore ignored the rules once more. After the US Supreme Court determined bans on same-sex marriage were unconstitutional in 2015, Moore directed probate judges to not issue marriage licenses, a move that got him suspended for the rest of his term. Moore resigned in April to run for Session’s Senate seat.

Moore’s disregard for court rulings has made him a favorite of evangelicals, who tend to be committed voters, making a low turnout primary good news for the candidate. Moore wears the disciplinary action against him as a badge of honor, arguing this makes him more trustworthy than the other candidates. “I’ve stood for traditional marriage and the acknowledgement of God, and with that, I have been reported to ethics commissions,” Moore said on the campaign trail. “It’s not what you say, it’s what you do.”

At a campaign rally Monday night, More pulled out a gun just in case anyone had any questions about his support for the Second Amendment.

Moore promises to be just as difficult in the Senate. The latest Republican effort to undo much of Obamacare—which GOP leaders abandoned Tuesday afternoon—would have resulted in millions of additional Americans going without health insurance. That wasn’t enough for Moore. According to his spokesperson, Moore opposed the bill and would refuse to vote for anything other than a full repeal of Obamacare. (Republicans failed to pass a version of “full repeal” earlier this year; the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that such a plan would increase the number of uninsured Americans by 32 million by 2026.)

In that sense, a victory by Moore could actually be good news for Democrats. If he won’t vote for anything other than a full repeal, that could make it even more difficult for Republicans to pass a health care bill in the future. Plus, some political observers think that Democrat Doug Jones, a former US attorney, would actually have a chance—albeit a long-shot one—of defeating Moore in December in this deeply red state.

You can follow the results of Tuesday’s runoff below, via Decision Desk HQ:

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate