Their Lives Were Forever Changed by Gun Violence. So They Ran for Office and Won.

“This is the time to move forward.”

Lucy McBath speaks at a rally in Atlanta on Friday, Nov. 2, 2018.Alyssa Pointer/Atlanta Journal-Constitution via AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In one sense, Election Day was a bit of a letdown for the Parkland survivors-turned-activists. The March for Our Lives teens had led the biggest protest in US history and crisscrossed the country registering thousands of young people to vote. And while they scored some significant electoral victories around the country, their home state efforts—which included more than two dozen stops on their Road to Change tour—appeared largely unsuccessful. Democrat Andrew Gillum on Tuesday conceded the governor’s race to Ron DeSantis, an anti-gun-control Republican endorsed by the National Rifle Association. In the Senate contest, Democratic incumbent Bill Nelson ended the night trailing his challenger, GOP Gov. Rick Scott—though the race now appears to be headed for a recount, and the outcome remains uncertain.

Still, for supporters of gun reform, including some whose lives have been forever changed by gun violence, Tuesday’s results contained plenty to celebrate. On Thursday morning, Lucy McBath—whose 17-year-old African-American son Jordan Davis was murdered in 2012 by a white man after the two argued about music playing in Davis’ car—narrowly won her race against GOP Rep. Karen Handel in Georgia’s 6th congressional district. McBath will join the new Democratic majority in the US House and will have the opportunity to vote on an ambitious suite of gun control legislation that Republican leaders had for years refused to bring to the floor.

Following her son’s death, McBath became a gun safety activist and served as a national spokesperson for Moms Demand Action, the grassroots volunteer arm of Everytown for Gun Safety. She was also a surrogate for Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign. Late last year, she announced plans to run for Georgia’s state House on a gun-reform-focused platform. After Parkland, she set her sights on higher office. “Shame on me if I don’t do this, if I’m helping everyone in the nation but not my own state,” she told Mother Jones about her decision to run for Congress back in April. “I don’t know how to be a politician, but this is the time to move forward.”

McBath wasn’t the only parent of a gun violence victim to declare victory this week. Tom Sullivan, who lost his son Alex in the 2012 movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado, defeated a Republican incumbent in Colorado’s state House. The veteran had helped lead the effort to pass stricter gun laws in Colorado, home to two of the deadliest mass shootings in US history. “I’m going to make a difference for people like Alex and for families like mine,” he told Denver magazine 5280 of his candidacy. “I don’t have all the answers, but I know I have courage and determination.”

Jennifer Longdon, who survived a drive-by shooting that left her paralyzed from the chest down, succeeded in her quest for a seat in Arizona’s state House. Longdon was the subject of a 2015 Mother Jones profile that documented how her 2004 injuries financially ruined her. A gun owner herself, she worked with former Arizona congresswoman and mass shooting survivor Gabby Giffords to found an Arizona coalition that seeks to reduce gun violence, and she served as the president of Arizonans for Gun Safety. Longdon, a Democrat, focused her campaign on gun reform and disability rights.

Success wasn’t limited to those who had experienced gun violence first-hand. Christy Clark, who won a seat in North Carolina’s House of Representatives, was one of roughly 50 Moms Demand Action volunteers who sought political office this cycle. The former leader of the group’s North Carolina state chapter, she decided to run because of her state-level gun reform efforts, noting how her “many hours in the General Assembly” working on the issue inspired her campaign. Local Moms Demand Actions volunteers relentlessly canvassed and phone banked for Clark.

The success of these candidates is a milestone for the gun violence prevention movement that was reborn in the wake of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. In the 1990s, Carolyn McCarthy won a New York congressional seat after she lost her husband to a shooting on Long Island’s commuter rail. Unlike McCarthy—who told Mother Jones in April how lonely her fight for firearms restrictions had been during her 18 years in Congress—these lawmakers will be joined by dozens of other newly elected officials who made gun control a key part of their campaigns.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate