Why Is Facebook Giving Pro-Vaccine Groups Such a Hard Time?

They have to jump through extra bureaucratic hurdles just to run their ads.

A vaccine is a biological preparation that provideMeyer & Meyer/iStock/Getty Images

The coronavirus is a rapidly developing news story, so some of the content in this article might be out of date. Check out our most recent coverage of the coronavirus crisis, and subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

Yesterday, Facebook announced that it would no longer run anti-vaccine ads, part of a new policy to stop the spread of health misinformation amidst the pandemic and the country’s divisive political landscape. The public health community hailed this as a partial success—they say the platform still hasn’t addressed the problem of rampant misinformation in its anti-vaccine groups.

But there’s another problem: Pro-vaccine groups still have to jump through extra bureaucratic hurdles to run their ads. What’s more, one of the oldest and most prominent immunization advocacy groups, Vaccinate Your Family, can’t seem to get the platform to fix a simple problem on its page that enables comments and discussion. 

“We really promote discourse on our page, and we think people should ask questions about vaccines,” says Amy Pisani, executive director of Vaccinate Your Family. “Now seems like a terrible time to shut down that discourse.”

Back in May, Pisani, who has worked on public health issues affecting children since 1996, noticed something peculiar: No one seemed to be commenting on the groups’ Facebook page. Suddenly, the group’s 200,000 followers—who have engaged in interesting discussions and networking in the comments ever since the group established its Facebook presence a decade ago—were oddly silent. Pisani was skeptical. It didn’t seem likely that every single person in the group had all of a suddenly clammed up. After a few tests, she determined that Facebook had abruptly changed the group’s settings so that no one could comment.

Figuring it was a simple mistake that could be easily reversed, Pisani reached out to Facebook and asked what had happened. She was surprised when Facebook groups coordinators responded that they didn’t know, but that they would work to make sure it would be resolved swiftly. Now, six months later, after Pisani’s team contacted Facebook every week to resolve the problem, the comments are still turned off. “They just tell me they’re working on it,” she says. When I contacted Facebook to ask about the problem, a spokesperson told me she would look into it but never got back to me—even after I followed up several times.

Meanwhile, anti-vaccine groups’ comments seem to be entirely open. I checked about a dozen of the groups that I follow, and all of them in the last few days had posted comments—many of which promoted wild conspiracy theories about vaccines, such as accusing Bill Gates of inserting microchips into shots to track Americans. 

Other pro-vaccine groups don’t seem to be having the same problem with comments. But the glitch still has major implications. Founded in 1991, Vaccinate Your Family is considered an important hub of information. I’ve been reporting on vaccine hesitancy for years, and epidemiologists and infectious diseases specialists have referred me to Vaccinate Your Family dozens of times. The comments provide an opportunity for members of the public to share information, ask questions, and organize vaccine advocacy efforts in their communities. 

The comments problem isn’t the only hurdle Vaccinate Your Family has encountered with Facebook. Last year, when the group launched a campaign based on scientific evidence about how vaccines prevent deadly diseases, Facebook rejected the ads. When Pisani asked why, Facebook informed her that her ads were subject to guidelines for ads that were “about social issues, elections or politics” rather than public health—which created an entirely different set of requirements for those who posted them. Pisani had to submit her personal information—her drivers’ license and her home address—in order to run the ads, which then still would be subject to extra scrutiny. Unlike the comments problem, this policy applies to all pro-vaccine groups, not just Vaccinate Your Family. And yet, people who advertise personal health products—say, for example, essential oils and vitamins—don’t have to jump through all those hoops. “It just doesn’t seem fair to penalize groups that are providing a public health service,” Pisani says.

Indeed, with these rules, Facebook seems to be taking the position that posts from Vaccinate Your Family are opinions about a controversial topic, rather than science-based public health information. Evidence overwhelmingly supports routine vaccination. Without this important tool, public health experts warn, we could quickly return to the era when communicable diseases like measles and whooping cough killed people. 

Pisani is still waiting for answers from Facebook on why Vaccinate Your Family’s comments were turned off. In the meantime, she worries that people who find her group will not be able to ask questions or connect with others. It’s a bad time to limit information about vaccines: Since the beginning of the pandemic, rates of routine childhood vaccination have declined precipitously. Meanwhile, anti-vaccine groups on Facebook have combined with anti-mask activists, spreading their ideas to new communities.

Amidst the unprecedented undermining of trust in public health science in the leadup to the release of vaccines for COVID-19, reliable information about vaccines has never been more important, says Pisani. “We spend our lives fighting disinformation.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate