How Trump’s Rush to Execute Inmates Is Spreading COVID

This comes as no surprise.

Andrew Harnik/AP

The coronavirus is a rapidly developing news story, so some of the content in this article might be out of date. Check out our most recent coverage of the coronavirus crisis, and subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

As the Trump administration rushes to carry out executions in its final days before President-elect Joe Biden is sworn in, the consequences of an unprecedented killing spree in the middle of a deadly pandemic are becoming more clear. Since July, eight executions have already taken place and five more are scheduled, with the last one planned for just five days before Inauguration Day.

Meanwhile, with more than 283,000 people dead and 15 million more infected, the United States has recently shattered records for infections, deaths, and hospitalizations from the coronavirus, as public health experts warn that the situation will only worsen until a vaccine is widely available. On Monday, the Associated Press reported that according to a court filing from lawyers representing inmates at the federal prison in Terre Haute, Indiana, the Department of Justice disclosed that staffers who were tasked with carrying out the executions have tested positive for the virus. On Tuesday, the ACLU circulated the court filing that revealed the exact numbers: Eight of 40 execution staffers tested positive after the November execution of Orlando Hall.*

This comes as no surprise. Because of crowded conditions and a population more likely to have underlying conditions that make them vulnerable to contracting COVID-19, prisons and jails have become hotspots for the disease, and federal prisons, where federal death row inmates are located, are no exception. The eight federal executions that took place this year have drawn hundreds of people—lawyers, witnesses, journalists, victims—into a virus hotspot at the federal penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana, where the death chamber is located. For months, public health experts have been warning about the risk of executions during a pandemic.

In September, I reported that the ACLU filed a lawsuit alleging that the execution spree may have led to an outbreak at the facility:

According to the documents the ACLU obtained through FOIA requests and discovery during a federal lawsuit, a US Bureau of Prisons’ staff member involved in carrying out the executions tested positive for the virus days before the first execution on July 14. The infected staff member had reported having “a lot” of contact with inmates and other staffers and did not always wear a mask while working. To make matters worse, BOP failed to test everyone who came into contact with the infected staff member and adopted a new policy that permits infected staff to return to work after just 10 days without symptoms and without being retested. Most public health experts recommend 14 days of quarantine. 

And not just prison staffers are infected. The execution of Lisa Montgomery was rescheduled from December 8 to January 12 after her lawyers contracted coronavirus either traveling to or while visiting Montgomery at the Fort Worth, Texas, prison where she is being held. In another case, after serving as spiritual adviser to Orlando Hall, the first person to be executed during a lame duck period in more than 100 years, Yusuf Ahmed Nur contracted the coronavirus. “Shortly after the execution, I tested positive for COVID-19,” Nur wrote in a blog post this week. “I was not surprised. I knew when I went to Orlando’s execution that I was stepping into a high-risk environment.”

Anti-death penalty activists, advocates, and a massive group of prosecutors and DOJ officials have called on the Trump administration to halt the executions. “Many have tried for over forty years to make America’s death penalty system just,” a statement from 100 law enforcement officials read. “Yet the reality is that our nation’s use of this sanction cannot be repaired, and it should be ended.” Biden, who was once a proponent of the death penalty, has pledged to end the practice at the federal level and seek incentives to encourage the 28 remaining capital punishment states to follow suit.

But in this, as with everything else, there’s no sign that the incoming administration will influence the current one. On Monday, the Associated Press, reported that Attorney General William Barr defended the practice. “If you ask juries to impose [capital punishment] and juries impose it, then it should be carried out,” he said. Barr, who now finds himself at odds with the president after asserting there was no widespread fraud in the 2020 election, said he may schedule even more executions before leaving his post. 

Correction: An earlier version of this article stated that the lawsuit was filed by the ACLU.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate