In Minnesota, Keith Ellison Narrowly Wins Attorney General Race

“Crime, crime, and crime” is how Ellison’s opponent described his campaign.

Mother Jones; Richard Tsong-Taatarii/Star Tribune/APMother Jones; Richard Tsong-Taatarii/Star Tribune/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In a close race State Attorney General Keith Ellison, a former six-term congressman and Deputy Chair of the Democratic National Committee, has narrowly won re-election as the top legal officer in Minnesota, defeating Republican challenger Jim Schultz.

Ellison was the first Black person elected to statewide office in the state’s history and the first Muslim elected to Congress. As attorney general, he famously led the successful prosecution of Derek Chauvin for murdering George Floyd.

In broad strokes, the race between Ellison and Schultz was defined by crime and abortion.

“Crime, crime, and crime” is how Schultz opened up a debate against Ellison when asked of his top priority. An ad running against Ellison by a PAC called Minnesota For Freedom, funded by the Republican Association of Attorneys General, labeled Ellison “the criminal’s choice for attorney general.” (Schultz has been accused of violating campaign finance law for coordinating with the PAC that produced the ad.)

Ellison, meanwhile, portrayed Schultz, a 37-year-old former hedge fund lawyer with little courtroom experience, as an inexperienced far-right ideologue, focusing in on his support for anti-abortion causes. 

During the primary, Schultz said he’d go on “offense” on abortion. He touted his work supporting a so-called crisis pregnancy center in southern Minnesota, among other points.

Schultz, like Republican candidate for governor Scott Jensen, backed away from publicly supporting abortion restrictions on the campaign trail. He’s proudly pro-life, he said, but would not “leverage his office” to push legislation in one way or another. “I didn’t get in this race to get caught up in abortion policy,” he said in the same debate

Ellison shot back, saying that Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett said the same of Roe v. Wade. Ellison also highlighted Schultz’s time on the board of directors of the Human Life Alliance, a group that wants to “make abortion not just illegal, but unthinkable.” 

“I’m for a woman’s right to choose,” Ellison said to Politico this summer. “He’s not. I’m for economic justice and welfare; he’s a hedge fund lawyer,”

Because of Ellison’s support for a failed ballot measure meant to overhaul the Minneapolis police department, Schultz made out Ellison to be a radical, anti-police firebrand who “slandered and maligned” cops. Throughout the campaign, Schultz emphasized an expansion of the criminal division of the attorney general’s office. Ellison has repeatedly said this is an overreach of the true purpose of the office, which is consumer protection. The ballot measure Ellison supported didn’t pass, and the Minneapolis police department has a higher budget today than they did before 2020.

Ellison’s accomplishments as “the people’s lawyer,” included leading the successful prosecution of Derek Chauvin for the murder of George Floyd, but also suing oil companies for deceiving Minnesotans about climate change, winning settlements from Big Pharma, and prosecuting wage theft. Long a standard-bearer for progressives in the Twin Cities and nationwide, Ellison got flak last summer because he did not take a public stance on the Line 3 Tar Sands oil pipeline, which prompted large protests throughout northern Minnesota in 2021. 

As I previously reported, Schultz had threatened to go even further to usurp the power of prosecutors in the name of prosecuting crime. He said he would look into wresting power from Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty, who was elected by Minneapolis voters last night, because of her “reckless plans for the office.”

Schultz also said that while he agreed with Ellison’s prosecution of Derek Chauvin, he planned to commute the sentence of Kim Potter, the former Brooklyn Center Police officer who was convicted on first-degree manslaughter charges for killing Daunte Wright. Schultz called it “politically motivated” and “mob justice.” 

Schultz positioned himself as a moderate. In the GOP primary, he defeated the conspiracy theorist and pillow magnate Mike Lindell’s ally and personal lawyer Doug Wardlow, who lost to Ellison in 2018. Compared to the other candidates on the statewide ticket like Covid-19 skeptic Jensen and election-denier Secretary of State candidate Kim Crockett, Schultz had the best chance to peel off voters in the suburbs of the Twin Cities metro area––essential to winning a statewide race as a Republican in Minnesota. “The way to do that is hammering him on crime,” Schultz told Politico

It didn’t work.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate