A Tale of Two Prosecutors

The rock ‘n’ roll fan and the slightly nerdy bookworm: crimefighters

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Kenneth StarrGarzon

Among the various trials of the century not involving Mike Tyson, Alan Dershowitz, or the Los Angeles police department are the prosecutions of American heads of state Bill Clinton and Augusto Pinochet (Hey! Don’t be so Norte — Chileans are Americans, too).

Although the Clinton case, in reality, has been all over but for the shouting since it was first introduced in the House, and the Senate failed to convict the cad; special persecutor Kenneth Starr is making rumblings that he might go after his white whale Willy in criminal court.

Meanwhile, Judge Baltasar Garzon is going after a slightly bigger fish whose crimes are of a completely different nature: former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet. If Garzon can manage to get Pinochet out of England and into Spain, the former dictator will have to answer for considerably more than ass-kissing.

In the spirit of, well, meanness quite frankly, the MoJo Wire takes a look at the two prosecutors, their cases and their quarry.

  Baltasar Garzon Kenneth Starr
Arch-nemesis Former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet Current U.S. President Bill Clinton
Nemesis’ alleged crime Genocide — the murder or disappearance of more than 3,000 people. Lying in order to conceal a sexual affair.
Percentage of Americans who admit committing the same acts 0, that we could find at least. 25% – men
10% – women
Length of investigation Two years Four-plus years
Cost of investigation Unavailable Roughly $50 million
Footloose factor “A keen rock ‘n’ roll fan” — The Telegraph “He’s a smart, hyper-religious, totally unathletic, slightly nerdy, [bespectacled] bookworm who sat out the sex, drugs and rock and roll revolution” — The Boston Herald
Previous experience Prosecuted drug smugglers, Basque separatist terrorists, gunmen who tried to murder those terrorists, former government ministers, and corrupt civil servants. Represented big tobacco, General Motors, and advised the Paula Jones’ legal team. In addition, Starr also served as chief of staff to Reagan Attorney General William French Smith.
Vaguely resembles George Hamilton A young Alan Greenspan
Talks to reporters when he’s… Coming in and out of the courthouse. Standing in his driveway.
Often compared to… Eliot Ness Joseph McCarthy, Captain Ahab
Named Man of the Year by… El Mundo Time
His critics Are reportedly trying to raise $1 million to have him assassinated. Work for Salon.
Nickname(s) Superjudge None*
His investigation began with The request by several Spanish legal associations to look into the torture, disappearance and killing of Spanish citizens in Argentina from 1976 to 1983. A probe into an Arkansas land deal from the same era.
He changed his focus… After concluding that the former dictator could be prosecuted under the Geneva Conventions — claiming serious crimes involving human rights can be prosecuted anywhere, anytime. In order to demonstrate that Clinton’s relationship with Lewinsky was relevant to Whitewater as it demonstrated a pattern of lies and deception.
Best anagram of his name… Grab Tarzan also Trash rent Ken
Rumor has it his quarry is currently… Shuffling about in his pajamas, munching marmalade sandwiches, getting used to the boredom of house arrest, and ordering Viagra by the fistfull over the Internet (Okay, that’s just speculation) Quietly celebrating his acquittal in the Senate, encouraging his wife to run for a seat in that same house, and ordering Viagra by the fistfull from over the Internet (Again, speculation, but in Bill’s case…)
Chance he’ll get his man (according to the MoJo Magic 8-Ball) All signs point to yes Don’t count on it

* Despite an exhaustive search, The MoJo Wire was unable to find any evidence that Kenneth Starr does now or has ever possessed a nickname — reminding this writer of something his grandfather once told him: “Don’t ever trust a man who’s never had a nickname.”

Photo by AP/Wide World Photos

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate